IRS liberalizes tax-free treatment of partial annuity
exchanges
Rev Proc 2011-38, 2011-30 IRB
In a Notice that further liberalizes previous guidance, IRS
has provided that the direct transfer of part of the cash surrender value of an
existing annuity contract for a second annuity contract will be treated as a
tax-free Code Sec. 1035 exchange if no amount (other than an amount received as
an annuity for a period of 10 years or more or during one or more lives) is
received during the 180 days beginning on the date of the transfer. A later
direct transfer won't be taken into account.
Background. No gain or loss is recognized on the exchange of
an annuity contract for another annuity contract. ( Code Sec. 1035(a)(3) )
Under Code Sec. 72(e)(2) , distributions from an annuity
contract that are not received as an annuity generally are taxed on an income-first
basis. For this purpose, Code Sec. 72(e)(12) provides that all annuity
contracts issued by the same company to the same policyholder during any
calendar year are treated as a single annuity contract. Code Sec. 72(q)(1)
imposes a 10% penalty on withdrawals or surrenders of annuity contracts, unless
one of the exceptions in Code Sec. 72(q)(2) applies.
In early 2008, IRS issued Rev Proc 2008-24, 2008-1 CB 684
(see Weekly Alert ¶ 9 03/20/2008 ),
which described when a direct transfer of part of the cash surrender value of
an existing annuity contract for a second annuity contract would be treated as
a tax-free Code Sec. 1035 exchange. A transfer was treated as a tax-free
exchange if no amount was withdrawn from, or received in surrender of, either
of the contracts involved in the exchange during the 12 months beginning on the
date of the transfer, or if the taxpayer demonstrated that one of the Code Sec.
72(q)(2) exceptions or any similar life event “occurred between” the date of
the transfer and the date of the withdrawal or surrender. A transfer that
wasn't treated as a tax-free Code Sec. 1035 exchange under this guidance was
instead treated as a taxable distribution under Code Sec. 72(e) , followed by a
payment for the second contract.
For amounts received in tax years beginning after Dec. 31,
2010, the Small Business Jobs Act (P.L. 111-240, 9/27/2010) provides rules for
the partial annuitization of a single annuity contract. Under Code Sec.
72(a)(2) , if any amount is received as an annuity for 10 years or more or
during one or more lives under any portion of an annuity, endowment or life
insurance contract, (a) that portion is treated as a separate contract for
purposes of Code Sec. 72 ; (b) the investment in the contract generally is
allocated pro rata between each part of the contract from which amounts are
received as an annuity and the portion from which amounts aren't so received;
and (c) a separate annuity starting date is determined for each portion of the
contract from which amounts are received as an annuity.
IRS has now modified and superseded the guidance in Rev Proc
2008-24 and has liberalized the rules even further.
New guidance. IRS says that a transfer described in Rev Proc
2011-38, Sec. 3 , i.e., a direct transfer of a part of the cash surrender value
of an existing annuity contract for a second annuity contract, that isn't a
transaction described in Code Sec. 72(a)(2) —regardless of whether the two
annuity contracts are issued by the same or different companies—will be treated
as a tax-free Code Sec. 1035 exchange. This treatment applies if no amount,
other than an amount received as an annuity for a period of 10 years or more or
during one or more lives, is received during the 180 days beginning on the date
of the transfer (in the case of a new contract, the date the contract is placed
in-force). ( Rev Proc 2011-38, Sec. 4.01 )
A later direct transfer of all or a part of either contract
involved in such an exchange isn't taken into account for purposes of applying
this guidance if it qualifies (or is intended to qualify) as a tax-free Code
Sec. 1035 exchange. ( Rev Proc 2011-38, Sec. 4.01 )
IRS won't require aggregation under Code Sec. 72(e)(12) or
otherwise of an original, pre-existing contract with a second contract that is
the subject of a tax-free Code Sec. 1035 exchange and Rev Proc 2011-38, Sec.
4.01 , even if both contracts are issued by the same insurance company, but
will instead treat the contracts as separate annuity contracts. ( Rev Proc
2011-38, Sec. 4.03 )
A transfer that is within the scope of the new revenue
procedure (i.e., described in Rev Proc 2011-38, Sec. 3 ), but not subject to
the above treatment under Rev Proc 2011-38, Sec. 4.01 , will be characterized
in a manner consistent with its substance, based on general tax principles and
all the facts and circumstances. ( Rev Proc 2011-38, Sec. 4.02 ) Thus, if a
direct transfer of a portion of the cash surrender value of an existing annuity
contract for a second annuity contract doesn't meet the 180-day test, IRS will
apply general tax principles to determine the substance and tax treatment of
the transfer. For example, an amount described by Code Sec. 72(e)(1)(A) that is
received under either the original contract or the new contract within 180 days
of the exchange may be characterized as either boot in a tax free exchange
under Code Sec. 1035(d)(1) and Code Sec. 1031(c) ) or a distribution under Code
Sec. 72(e) .
In sum, Rev Proc 2011-38 amends Rev Proc 2008 Rev Proc 24 to
provide that: (1) the 12-month period referred to in Rev Proc 2008-24, Sec.
4.01(a) , is reduced to 180 days; (2) the rule requiring that one of the
enumerated Code Sec. 72(q) conditions be met (or that a similar life event
occur) is eliminated; (3) the limitations on amounts withdrawn from or received
under an annuity contract involved in a partial exchange do not apply to
amounts received as an annuity for a period of 10 years or more or during one
or more lives; and (4) the automatic characterization of a transfer (as either
a tax-free Code Sec. 1035 exchange or a distribution taxable under Code Sec.
72(e) followed by a payment for a second contract) is eliminated.
Effective date. Rev Proc 2011-38 is effective for transfers
that are completed on or after Oct. 24, 2011. Rev Proc 2008-24 will continue to
apply to transfers that are completed before that date. ( Rev Proc 2011-38,
Sec. 5 )
Rev Proc 2011-38, Sec. 5 , also clarifies that the
requirement in Rev Proc 2008-24, Sec. 4.01(b) , that one of the prescribed
conditions of Code Sec. 72(q)(2) must have “occurred between” the date of the
transfer and the date of the withdrawal or surrender, will be treated as
satisfied if the condition was satisfied as of the date of the withdrawal or
surrender. Thus, for example, an individual who attained the age of 59 1/2
before both the date of the transfer and the date of the withdrawal or
surrender has satisfied this condition. ( Rev Proc 2011-38, Sec. 5 )
Rev. Proc. 2011-38, 2011-30 IRB, 06/28/2011, IRC Sec(s).
Headnote:
Reference(s):
Full Text:
Purpose
This revenue procedure addresses the tax treatment of
certain tax-free exchanges of annuity contracts under § 72 and
§ 1035 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Rev. Proc. 2008-24, 2008-1 C.B. 684, is modified and superseded.
Background
Section 1035(a)(3)
provides that no gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of an annuity
contract for another annuity contract. The legislative history of § 1035 states that exchange treatment is
appropriate for “individuals who have merely exchanged one insurance policy for
another better suited to their needs.” H.R. Rep. No. 1337, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.
81 (1954). Section 1.1035-1 of the
Income Tax Regulations provides that “the exchange, without recognition of gain
or loss, of an annuity contract for another annuity contract under § 1035(a)(3) is limited to cases where the
same person or persons are the obligee or obligees under the contract received
in the exchange as under the original contract.”
If, in addition to an annuity contract, a taxpayer receives
other property or money in exchange for a second annuity contract, then gain
(if any) is recognized to the extent of the sum of money and the fair market
value of other property received, but loss (if any) is not recognized to any
extent. Section 1035(d)(1) (cross
referencing § 1031(b) and (c)); § 1.1031(b)-1(a); § 1031(c)-1.
Section 72(e)
governs the federal tax treatment of any amount received under an annuity
contract that is not received as an annuity if no other income tax provision
applies with respect to such amount. Under
§ 72(e)(2), such amounts generally are taxed on an income-first
basis. Section 72(e)(12) provides that
all annuity contracts issued by the same company to the same policyholder
during any calendar year are treated as a single annuity contract for purposes
of § 72(e).
In Conway v. Commissioner,
111 T.C. 350 (1998), acq., 1999-2 C.B. xvi, the Tax Court held that the
direct exchange by an insurance company of a portion of an existing annuity
contract to an unrelated insurance company for a new annuity contract was a
tax-free exchange under § 1035. Such a
transaction is sometimes referred to as a “partial exchange.” See also Rev. Rul. 2007-24, 2007-21 I.R.B. 1282
(receipt of a check under a nonqualified annuity contract and endorsement of
the check to a second company as consideration for a second annuity contract
treated as a distribution under §
72(e), rather than as a tax-free exchange under § 1035);
Rev. Rul. 2002-75, 2002-2 C.B. 812 (assignment of an entire annuity
contract for deposit into a preexisting annuity contract treated as a tax-free
exchange under § 1035).
In Rev. Rul.
2003-76, 2003-2 C.B. 355, a taxpayer directly transferred a portion of the cash
surrender value of an existing annuity contract (the original contract) for a
new contract issued by a second insurance company. The ruling concludes that
the transfer was a tax-free exchange under
§ 1035, and that the basis and investment in the contract for the
original contract immediately before the exchange was required to be allocated
ratably between the original contract and the new contract based on the
percentage of the cash value transferred to purchase the new contract.
Rev. Proc. 2008-24
set forth circumstances under which a direct transfer of a portion of the cash
surrender value of an existing annuity contract for a second annuity contract
would be treated as a tax-free exchange under
§ 1035. Under the revenue procedure, a transfer was treated as a
tax-free exchange if no amount was withdrawn from, or received in surrender of,
either of the contracts involved in the exchange during the 12 months beginning
on the date of the transfer, or if the taxpayer demonstrated that one of the
conditions described by § 72(q)(2)(A),
(B), (C), (E), (F), (G), (H), or (J) or any similar life event “occurred
between” the date of the transfer and the date of the withdrawal or surrender.
A transfer within the scope of Rev.
Proc. 2008-24 that was not treated as a tax-free exchange under § 1035 was instead treated as a taxable
distribution under § 72(e), followed by
a payment for the second contract. Rev.
Proc. 2008-24 superseded interim guidance provided by Notice 2003-51, 2003-2 C.B. 362.
Section 2113 of the
Small Business Jobs Act, P.L. 111-240, added
§ 72(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code to provide rules for the partial
annuitization of a single annuity contract.
Section 72(a)(2) provides that, if any amount is received as an annuity
for 10 years or more or during one or more lives under any portion of an
annuity, endowment or life insurance contract— (a) that portion is treated as a
separate contract for purposes of § 72;
(b) the investment in the contract generally is allocated pro rata between each
portion of the contract from which amounts are received as an annuity and the
portion from which amounts are not so received; and (c) a separate annuity
starting date is determined with respect to each portion of the contract from
which amounts are received as an annuity. The amendment applies to amounts
received in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010.
Since 2008, Treasury and the Service have learned of several
practical issues that diminish the effectiveness of Rev. Proc. 2008-24. For example, some
taxpayers have commented that it is not clear how the “occurred between”
standard should be applied with regard to several of the conditions that are
enumerated in § 72(q)(2) or to similar
life events. Other taxpayers have commented that the alternative
characterization of a transfer that does not qualify as a tax-free exchange is
unclear, and that a 12-month waiting period produces administrative
difficulties in some situations where an income tax return already was filed
for the year in which the transfer took place. Still others have argued that
Treasury and the Service should provide relief for payments received as an
annuity under an annuity contract involved in a partial exchange. As a result
of the recent amendment of § 72(a), a
taxpayer may partially annuitize a single annuity contract and apply an
exclusion ratio, rather than the income-first rule of § 72(e), to amounts received as an annuity
under the annuitized portion of the contract.
Treasury and the Service have determined that it is in the
interest of sound tax administration to modify the guidance provided by Rev. Proc. 2008-24 to address these issues.
Accordingly, this revenue procedure makes the following changes to Rev. Proc. 2008-24: First, the 12-month
period referred to in section 4.01(a) of
Rev. Proc. 2008-24 is reduced to 180 days. Second, the rule requiring
that one of the enumerated § 72(q)
conditions be met (or that a similar life event occur) is eliminated. Third,
the limitations on amounts withdrawn from or received under an annuity contract
involved in a partial exchange do not apply to amounts received as an annuity for
a period of 10 years or more or during one or more lives. Fourth, the automatic
characterization of a transfer as either a tax-free exchange under § 1035 or a distribution taxable under § 72(e) followed by a payment for a second
contract is eliminated. Under this approach, if a direct transfer of a portion
of the cash surrender value of an existing annuity contract for a second
annuity contract does not meet the 180-day test described above, the Service
will apply general tax principles to determine the substance, and hence the
treatment, of the transfer. Thus, for example, an amount described by § 72(e)(1)(A) that is received under either
the original contract or the new contract within 180 days of the exchange may
be characterized as either boot in a tax free exchange (see § 1035(d)(1) and 1031(c)) or a distribution under § 72(e).
Scope
This revenue procedure applies to the direct transfer of a
portion of the cash surrender value of an existing annuity contract for a
second annuity contract, regardless of whether the two annuity contracts are
issued by the same or different companies.
This revenue procedure does not apply to transactions to
which § 72(a)(2) applies.
Procedure
A transfer that is within the scope of this revenue procedure
will be treated as a tax-free exchange under
§ 1035 if no amount, other than an amount received as an annuity for a
period of 10 years or more or during one or more lives, is received under
either the original contract or the new contract during the 180 days beginning
on the date of the transfer (in the case of a new contract, the date the
contract is placed in-force). A subsequent direct transfer of all or a portion
of either contract involved in an exchange described in this section 4.01 is
not taken into account for purposes of applying this section if the subsequent
transfer qualifies (or is intended to qualify) as a tax-free exchange
under § 1035.
A transfer that is within the scope of this revenue
procedure but not described in section 4.01 will be characterized in a manner
consistent with its substance, based on general tax principles and all the
facts and circumstances.
The Service will not require aggregation pursuant to the
authority of § 72(e)(12), or otherwise,
of an original, pre-existing contract with a second contract that is the
subject of a tax-free exchange under §
1035 and section 4.01 of this revenue procedure, even if both contracts are
issued by the same insurance company, but will instead treat the contracts as
separate annuity contracts. See Rev.
Rul. 2003-76; Rev. Rul. 2007-38, 2007-1
C.B. 1420.
Effective Date
This revenue procedure is effective for transfers described
in section 3 of this revenue procedure
that are completed on or after October 24, 2011. Rev. Proc. 2008-24 will continue to apply to
transfers that are completed before that date, with the clarification of the
requirement of section 4.01(b) that one of the prescribed conditions of § 72(q)(2) have “occurred between” the date
of the transfer and the date of the withdrawal or surrender will be treated as
satisfied if the condition was satisfied as of the date of the withdrawal or
surrender. Thus, for example, an individual who attained the age of 59 1/2
before both the date of the transfer and the date of the withdrawal or
surrender has satisfied the condition of
§ 72(q)(2)(A) and will be treated as satisfying section 4.01(b) of Rev. Proc. 2008-24.
Effect On Other Documents
Rev. Proc. 2008-24
is modified and superseded.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this revenue procedure is John E.
Glover of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions
& Products). For further information regarding this revenue procedure,
contact Mr. Glover at (202) 622-3970 (not a toll-free call).
www.irstaxattorney.com 888-712-7690
No comments:
Post a Comment