Summary of key provisions in ground-breaking health reform law
In the late evening of March 25, Congress passed H.R. 4872, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Reconciliation Act). Once the President signs it, a massive overhaul of the U.S. health care system affecting nearly all taxpayers, many employers, and many elements of the health care industry will be complete.

The Reconciliation Act modifies legislation signed into law on March 23 that contains the bulk of the health reform law, H.R. 3590, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Health Care Act, P.L. 111-148 ). However, the Reconciliation Act also includes new provisions that weren't part of the earlier legislation, such as codification of economic substance, elimination of a tax credit for “black liquor” and expanded dependent coverage in employer health plans.

Tax Changes Relating to Universal Health Coverage Mandate
Penalty for remaining uninsured. For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2013, non-exempt U.S. citizens and legal residents will have to maintain minimum essential coverage or pay a penalty.

Those failing to maintain minimum essential coverage in 2016 will be subject to a penalty equal to the greater of: (1) 2.5% of household income over the threshold amount of income required for income tax return filing, or (2) $695 per uninsured adult in the household. The fee for an uninsured individual under age 18 will be one-half of the fee for an adult. The total household penalty won't exceed 300% of the per adult penalty ($2,085), nor exceed the national average annual premium for the “bronze level” health plan offered through the Insurance Exchange that year for the household size.

The per adult annual penalty will be phased in as follows: $95 for 2014; $325 for 2015; and $695 in 2016. For years after 2016, the $695 amount will be indexed to CPI-U, rounded to the next lowest $50. The percentage of income will be phased in as follows: 1% for 2014; 2% in 2015; and 2.5% beginning after 2015. If a taxpayer files a joint return, the individual and spouse will be jointly liable for any penalty payment. The penalty, which will apply to any period the individual does not maintain minimum essential coverage (determined monthly) will be assessed through the Code.

Among those individuals who will be exempted from the penalty: Individuals who cannot afford coverage because their required contribution for employer sponsored coverage or the lowest cost “bronze plan” in the local Insurance Exchange exceeds 8% of household income; those who are exempted for religious reasons; and those residing outside of the U.S. ( Code Sec. 5000A , as added by Health Care Act Sec. 1501, as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10106, and as further amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1002)

Low-income tax credits for participating in health exchanges. For tax years ending after 2013, tax credits will be available for individuals and families with incomes up to 400% of the federal poverty level ($43,320 for an individual or $88,200 for a family of four) that are not eligible for Medicaid, employer sponsored insurance, or other acceptable coverage. These individuals and families will have to obtain health care coverage in newly established Insurance Exchanges in order to obtain credits. (New Code Sec. 36B , Health Care Act Sec. 1401, 1411 and 1412, as amended by Health Care Act Secs. 10104, 10105, and 1017, and as further amended by Heath Care Act Sec. 1001) A “cost-sharing subsidy” will be provided to low income individuals to help with health insurance costs. (Health Care Act Secs. 1402, 1411, and 1412, as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10104, and further amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1001)

Employer responsibilities. For months beginning after Dec. 31, 2013, an “applicable large employer” (generally, one that employed an average of at least 50 full-time employees during the preceding calendar year) not offering coverage for all its full-time employees, offering minimum essential coverage that is unaffordable, or offering minimum essential coverage that consists of a plan under which the plan's share of the total allowed cost of benefits is less than 60%, will have to pay a penalty if any full-time employee is certified to the employer as having purchased health insurance through a state exchange with respect to which a tax credit or cost-sharing reduction is allowed or paid to the employee. The penalty for any month will be an excise tax equal to the number of full-time employees over a 30-employee threshold during the applicable month (regardless of how many employees are receiving a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction) multiplied by one-twelfth of $2,000.

Also, an applicable large employer that offers, for any month, its full-time employees and their dependents the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage under an employer sponsored plan will be subject to a penalty if any full-time employee is certified to the employer as having enrolled in health insurance coverage purchased through a State exchange with respect to which a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction is allowed or paid to such employee or employees. ( Code Sec. 4980H , as added by Health Care Act Sec. 1513, as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10106, and as further amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1003)

“Free choice vouchers.” After Dec. 31, 2013, employers offering minimum essential coverage through an eligible employer-sponsored plan and paying a portion of that coverage will have to provide qualified employees with a voucher whose value can be applied to purchase of a health plan through the Insurance Exchange. Qualified employees are those employees:

... who do not participate in the employer's health plan;
... whose required contribution for employer sponsored minimum essential coverage (if they did participate in the plan) exceeds 8%, but does not exceed 9.5% of household income; and
... whose total household income does not exceed 400% of the poverty line for the family.
After 2014, the 8% and 9.5% will be indexed to the excess of premium growth for the preceding calendar year. The value of the voucher is equal to the dollar value of the employer contribution to the employer offered health plan and is not includable in income to the extent it is used for the purchase of health plan coverage. If the value of the voucher exceeds the premium of the health plan chosen by the employee, the employee is paid the excess value of the voucher. The excess amount received by the employee is includible in gross income. If an individual receives a voucher, he is disqualified from receiving any tax credit or cost sharing credit for the purchase of a plan in the Insurance Exchange. Similarly, if any employee receives a free choice voucher, the employer is not assessed a shared responsibility payment on behalf of that employee. ( Code Sec. 139D , as added by Health Care Act Sec. 10108)

Tax credits for small employers offering health coverage. For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2009, an eligible small employer will be given a tax credit for nonelective contributions to purchase health insurance for its employees. An eligible small employer generally is an employer with no more than 25 full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) employed during the employer's tax year, and whose employees have annual full-time equivalent wages that average no more than $50,000. However, the full amount of the credit is available only to an employer with 10 or fewer FTEs and whose employees have average annual fulltime equivalent wages from the employer of less than $25,000. These wage limits will be indexed to the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for years beginning in 2014.

For tax years beginning in 2010 through 2013, the credit will be 35% for small employers with fewer than 25 employees and average annual wages of less than $50,000 who offer health insurance coverage to their employees. In 2014 and later, eligible small employers who purchase coverage through the Insurance Exchange will be eligible for a tax credit for two years of up to 50% of their contribution. ( Code Sec. 45R , as added by Health Care Act Sec. 1421, as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10105)

Dependent coverage in employer health plans. Effective on the enactment date of the Reconciliation Act, the general exclusion for reimbursements for medical care expenses under an employer-provided accident or health plan is extended to any child of an employee who has not attained age 27 as of the end of the tax year. The Committee Report says this change is also intended to apply to the exclusion for employer-provided coverage under an accident or health plan for injuries or sickness for such a child. Also, self-employed individuals may take a deduction for any child of the taxpayer who has not attained age 27 as of the end of the tax year. ( Code Sec. 105 , Code Sec. 162 , Code Sec. 401 , and Code Sec. 501 , as amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1004(b))

Health-Related Revenue Raisers
Excise tax on high-cost employer-sponsored health coverage. For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, a 40% nondeductible excise tax will be levied on insurance companies and plan administrators for any health coverage plan to the extent that the annual premium exceeds $10,200 for single coverage and $27,500 for family coverage. An additional threshold amount of $1,650 for single coverage and $3,450 for family coverage will apply for retired individuals age 55 and older and for plans that cover employees engaged in high risk professions.

The tax will apply to self-insured plans and plans sold in the group market, but not to plans sold in the individual market (except for coverage eligible for the deduction for self-employed individuals). Stand-alone dental and vision plans will be disregarded in applying the tax. The dollar amount thresholds will be automatically increased if the inflation rate for group medical premiums between 2010 and 2018 is higher than the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates in 2010.

Employers with age and gender demographics that result in higher premiums could value the coverage provided to employees using the rates that will apply using a national risk pool.

The excise tax will be levied at the insurer level. Employers will be required to aggregate the coverage subject to the limit and issue information returns for insurers indicating the amount subject to the excise tax. ( Code Sec. 4980I , as added by Health Care Act Sec. 9001, as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10901, and as further amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1401)

Cost of employer sponsored health coverage included on Form W-2. For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010, employers must disclose the value of the benefit provided by them for each employee's health insurance coverage on the employee's annual Form W-2. ( Code Sec. 6051(a)(14) , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 9002)

Other new employer reporting responsibilities for health coverage. For calendar years beginning after 2013, insurers (including employers who self-insure) that provide minimum essential coverage to any individual during a calendar year must report the following to both the covered individual and to IRS: (1) name, address, and taxpayer identification number (TIN) of the primary insured, and name and TIN of each other individual obtaining coverage under the policy; (2) the dates during which the individual was covered under the policy during the calendar year; (3) whether the coverage is a qualified health plan offered through an exchange; (4) the amount of any premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction received by the individual with respect to such coverage; and (5) such other information as IRS may require. To the extent coverage is through an employer-provided group health plan, the insurer is also required to report the name, address and employer identification number of the employer, the portion of the premium, if any, required to be paid by the employer, and any other information IRS may require to administer the new tax credit for eligible small employers (see discussion above). ( Code Sec. 6056 , as added by, and Code Sec. 6724 , as amended by, Health Care Act Sec. 1514)

Additional Hospital Insurance Tax (HI) for high wage workers. For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012, the HI tax rate is increased by 0.9 percentage points on an individual taxpayer earning over $200,000 ($250,000 for married couples filing jointly); these figures are not indexed. ( Code Sec. 1401 and Code Sec. 3101 , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 9015, as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10906)

Surtax on unearned income. For remuneration received, and tax years beginning after, Dec. 31, 2012, a 3.8% surtax (called the Unearned Income Medicare Contribution) will apply to net investment income of higher income taxpayers. The surtax for individuals is 3.8% of the lesser of (1) net investment income or (2) the excess of modified adjusted gross income (AGI) over the threshold amount. The threshold amount is $250,000 for a joint return or surviving spouse, $125,000 for a married individual filing a separate return, and $200,000 in any other case. Modified AGI is AGI increased by the amount excluded from income as foreign earned income under Code Sec. 911(a)(1) (net of the deductions and exclusions disallowed with respect to the foreign earned income).

For an estate or trust, the surtax is 3.8% of the lesser of: (1) undistributed net investment income or (2) the excess of AGI (as defined in Code Sec. 67(e) ) over the dollar amount at which the highest income tax bracket applicable to an estate or trust begins.

The tax does not apply to a nonresident alien or to a trust all the unexpired interests in which are devoted to charitable purposes, a trust that is exempt from tax under Code Sec. 501 , or a charitable remainder trust exempt from tax under Code Sec. 664 .

The surtax is subject to the individual estimated tax provisions and is not deductible in computing any tax imposed by subtitle A of the Code (relating to income taxes).

Net investment income for surtax purposes is interest, dividends, royalties, rents, gross income from a trade or business involving passive activities, and net gain from disposition of property (other than property held in a trade or business). Investment income is reduced by properly allocable deductions to such income to arrive at nest investment income. ( Code Sec. 1411 , as added by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1402)

New limit on health FSA contributions. For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012, the amount of contributions to health flexible spending accounts (FSAs) under cafeteria plans will be limited to $2,500 per year. The dollar amount will be inflation indexed after 2013. ( Code Sec. 125 , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 9005, as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10902, and as further amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1403)

Restricted definition of medical expenses for employer provided coverage. For purposes of employer provided health coverage (including health reimbursement accounts (HRAs) and health flexible savings accounts (FSAs), health savings accounts (HSAs), and Archer medical savings accounts (MSAs)), the definition of medicine expenses deductible as a medical expense is generally conformed to the definition for purposes of the itemized deduction for medical expenses. But this change does not apply to doctor prescribed over-the-counter medicine. Thus, the cost of over-the-counter medicine (other than insulin or doctor prescribed medicine) cannot be reimbursed through a health FSA or HRA. In addition, the cost of over-the-counter medicines (other than insulin or doctor prescribed medicine) cannot be reimbursed on a tax-free basis through an HSA or Archer MSA. These changes for HSAs and Archer MSAs apply for amounts paid with respect to tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010. The changes for health FSAs and HRAs apply for expenses incurred with respect to tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010. ( Code Sec. 106(f) , Code Sec. 220(d)(2) , and Code Sec. 223(d)(3) , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 9003)

Increased tax on nonqualifying HSA or Archer MSA distributions. For distributions made after Dec. 31, 2010, the additional tax for HSA withdrawals before age 65 that are used for purposes other than qualified medical expenses is increased from 10% to 20%, and the additional tax for Archer MSA withdrawals that are used for purposes other than qualified medical expenses is increased from 15% to 20%. ( Code Sec. 220(f)(4)(A) and Code Sec. 223(f)(4)(A) , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 9004)

Modified threshold for claiming medical expense deductions. For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012, the adjusted gross income (AGI) threshold for claiming the itemized deduction for medical expenses will be increased from 7.5% to 10%. However, the 7.5%-of-AGI threshold will continue to apply through 2016 to individuals age 65 and older (and their spouses). ( Code Sec. 56(b)(1)(B) , Code Sec. 213(a) , and Code Sec. 213(f) , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 9004)

Deduction for employer Part D is eliminated. For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012, the deduction for the subsidy for employers who maintain prescription drug plans for their Medicare Part D eligible retirees will be eliminated. (Health Care Act Sec. 9012, as amended by Reconciliation Act 1407)

Industry-specific revenue raisers. The following revenue raising changes will be imposed on health related industries:

... A new deduction limit on executive compensation applies to insurance providers. If at least 25% of the insurance provider's gross premium income is derived from health insurance plans that meet the minimum essential coverage requirements in the new health reform law (“covered health insurance provider”), an annual $500,000 per tax year compensation deduction limit will apply for all officers, employees, directors, and other workers or service providers performing services for or on behalf of a covered health insurance provider. The limit applies to tax years beginning after Dec. 1, 2009, with respect to services performed after that date. ( Code Sec. 162(m)(6) , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 9014)
... Pharmaceutical manufacturers and importers will have to pay an annual flat fee beginning in 2011 allocated across the industry according to market share. The annual flat fee beginning in 2011 is allocated across the industry according to market share. The schedule for the flat fee is: 2011, $2.5 billion; 2012 to 2013, $2.8 billion; 2014 to 2016, $3 billion; 2017, $4 billion; 2018, $4.1 billion; 2019 and later, $2.8 billionThe fee will not apply to companies with sales of branded pharmaceuticals of $5 million or less. (Health Care Act Sec. 9008, as amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1404)
... For sales after Dec. 31, 2012, manufacturers or importers of medical devices will have to pay a 2.3% of the sale price is imposed on the sale of any taxable medical device by the manufacturer, producer, or importer of the device. A taxable medical device is any device, defined in section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, intended for humans. The excise tax will not apply to eyeglasses, contact lenses, hearing aids, and any other medical device determined by IRS to be of a type that is generally purchased by the general public at retail for individual use. ( Code Sec. 4191 , as added by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1405)
... Health insurance providers will face an annual flat fee on the health insurance sector effective for calendar years beginning after Dec. 31, 2013. The fee will be allocated based on market share of net premiums written for a U.S. health risk for calendar years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012. The aggregate annual flat fee for the industry will be: $8 billion for 2014; $11.3 billion for 2015 and 2016; $13.9 billion for 2017; and $14.3 billion for 2018. The fee will be indexed to the rate of premium growth for later years. The fee will not apply to companies whose net premiums written are $25 million or less. (Health Care Act Sec. 9010, as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10905, as further amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1406)
... For services provided on or after July 1, 2010, a 10% excise tax applies to indoor tanning services. ( Code Sec. 5000B , as added by Health Care Act Sec. 9017, as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10907)
... For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2009, nonprofit Blue Cross Blue Shield organizations must maintain a medical loss ratio of 85% or higher in order to take advantage of the special tax benefits provided to them, including the deduction for 25% of claims and expenses and the 100% deduction for unearned premium reserves. ( Code Sec. 833(c)(5) , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 9016)
... Effective generally for tax years beginning after Mar. 23, 2010, new qualification requirements apply to any Code Sec. 501(c)(3) organization that operates at least one hospital facility. ( Code Sec. 501(r) and Code Sec. 6033(b) as amended by Health Care Act Secs. 9007 and 10903) Additionally, for failures occurring after Mar. 23, 2010, an excise tax of $50,000 applies if a tax-exempt charitable hospital organization fails to meet certain new community health needs assessments requirements for any tax year. Code Sec. 4959 , as added Health Care Act Sec. 9007)
Non-Health Related Revenue Raisers
Corporate information reporting. For payments made after Dec. 31, 201, businesses that pay any amount greater than $600 during the year to corporate providers of property and services will have to file an information report with each provider and with IRS. ( Code Sec. 6041(h) , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 9006)

Codification of economic substance doctrine and imposition of penalties. The economic substance doctrine is a judicial doctrine that has been used by the courts to deny tax benefits when the transaction generating these tax benefits lacks economic substance. The courts have not applied the economic substance doctrine uniformly. For transactions entered into after the enactment date of the Reconciliation Act, and to underpayments, understatements, and refunds and credits attributable to transactions entered into after the enactment date of the Reconciliation Act, the manner in which the economic substance doctrine should be applied by the courts is clarified and a penalty is imposed on understatements attributable to a transaction lacking economic substance. ( Code Sec. 6662 , Code Sec. 6662A , Code Sec. 6664 , Code Sec. 6676 , and Code Sec. 7701 , as amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1409)

Elimination of credit for “black liquor.” A $1.01 per gallon tax credit applies for the production of biofuel from cellulosic feedstocks in order to encourage the development of new production capacity for biofuels that are not derived from food source materials. Congress is aware that some taxpayers are seeking to claim the cellulosic biofuel tax credit for unprocessed fuels, such as “black liquor.” For fuel sold or used after Dec. 31, 2009, eligibility for the tax credit under the Reconciliation Act will be limited to processed fuels (i.e., fuels that could be used in a car engine or in a home heating application). ( Code Sec. 40 , as amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1408)

Estimated taxes for large corporations. The required corporate estimated tax payments factor for corporations with assets of at least $1 billion will be increased by 15.75 percentage points for payments due in July, August, and September of 2014. ( Code Sec. 6655 , as amended by Reconciliation Act Sec. 1410)

Other Tax Changes
Simple cafeteria plans for small businesses. For tax years beginning after 2010, a new employee benefit cafeteria plan known as a Simple Cafeteria Plan will be available. This plan will be subject to eased participation restrictions so that small businesses could provide tax-free benefits to their employees; it will include self-employed individuals as qualified employees. ( Code Sec. 125(j) , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 9022)

Liberalized adoption credit and adoption assistance rules. For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2009, the adoption tax credit will be increased by $1,000, and made refundable. The adoption assistance exclusion also will be increased by $1,000. Both credit and exclusion are extended through 2011. ( Code Sec. 23 and Code Sec. 137 , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10909)

New credit for new therapies. For expenses paid or incurred after Dec. 31, 2008, in tax years beginning after that date, a two-year temporary credit applies, subject to an overall cap of $1 billion, to encourage investments in new therapies to prevent, diagnose, and treat acute and chronic diseases. ( Code Sec. 48D , as added by Health Care Act Sec. 9023)

New exclusion for certain health professionals. Payments made under any State loan repayment or loan forgiveness program that is intended to provide for the increased availability of health care services in underserved or health professional shortage areas are excluded from gross income, effective for amounts received by an individual in tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2008. ( Code Sec. 108(f) , as amended by Health Care Act Sec. 10908) (A separate provision excludes from gross income the value of specified Indian tribal health benefits, effective for benefits and coverage provided after Mar. 23, 2010 (the enactment date of the Health Care Act.) ( Code Sec. 139D , as added by Health Care Act Sec. 9021)


Click here for legislative language of the House's “Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 4872 as Reported.” This substitute amendment amends H.R. 3590, the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” as passed by the Senate and House.


Click here for legislative language of the “Amendment to the Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 4872 as Reported.” This Manager's Amendment was incorporated into the House-passed “Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 4872 as Reported.”


Click here for legislative language of H.R. 3590, the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” as passed by the Senate on December 24, 2009, and by the House on March 21, 2010.


Click here for JCX-18–10 (march 21, 2010), the Joint Committee on Taxation Staff's “Technical Explanation of the Revenue Provisions of the Reconciliation Act of 2010, as Amended, in Combination with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”


Click here for JCX-17–10 (March 20, 2010), the Joint Committee on Taxation's “Estimated Revenue Effects of the Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 4872, the Reconciliation Act of 2010, as Amended, in Combination With the Revenue Effects of H.R. 3590, The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act (PPACA), as Passed by the Senate, and Scheduled for Consideration by the House Committee on Rules on March 20, 2010 ”


Click here for a section by section summary of how the House-passed Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 4872 as Reported, changes the health reform measure passed by the Senate.


Click here for a summary of the revenue provisions in the House passed Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 4872 as Reported.


Click here for a summary of “employers and health reform” provisions in the House passed Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 4872 as Reported.


Click here for a summary titled “Reconciliation Bill Makes Key Improvements”; it relates to the House passed Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 4872 as Reported.

offer in compromise - criminal record
UIL No. 7122.00-00, 7122.09-00 Offers-in-compromise—IRS authority—court-ordered restitution.
Headnote:
IRS wasn't prohibited from processing and considering merits of OIC submitted by taxpayer convicted in criminal tax case where, although IRS lacks authority to compromise amount of tax liability that equals court ordered restitution for tax years subject of criminal proceeding, court's order in instant case that taxpayer cooperate with IRS, submit all delinquent tax returns, and pay all back taxes didn't constitute restitution.
Reference(s): IRC Sec(s). 7122


FULL TEXT:

ID: CCA_2008121016444445
Office:
UILC: 7122.00-00, 7122.09-00
Number: 200909051
Release Date: 2/27/2009
From:
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 4:44:46 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Legal Opinion -
We have reviewed the documents in this case, including the Plea Agreement and Judgment, and have concluded that the Service may process the taxpayer's submitted offer-in-compromise (OIC) which includes tax years [Redacted Text].
IRC § 7122 authorizes the Service to compromise any civil or criminal case arising under the internal revenue laws prior to reference to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for prosecution or defense. DOJ's exclusive authority to compromise a case ends when the referred case is completed. In a criminal case, such as this case, the referral was completed when the Judgment was entered by the District Court and the time for appeal expired. Accordingly, the authority to compromise this case pursuant to section 7122 has reverted to the Service.
In a criminal tax case, the District Court may order the taxpayer to pay restitution to the United States. Restitution is not a tax but is usually ordered in an amount equal to the defendant's unpaid tax liability. The Service's policy is to credit restitution payments against the tax liability. The Service does not have authority to compromise the amount of tax liability that equals the court ordered restitution for tax years subject to the criminal proceeding.
In this case, the District Court ordered the defendant, as terms of his probation, to cooperate with the Service, submit all delinquent tax returns and pay all back taxes plus interest under the guidance and supervision of his supervising probation officer. The court did not order restitution and the probation term requiring the payment of back taxes plus interest is not the equivalent of a restitution order. Accordingly, the Service is not prohibited from processing and considering the merits of the OIC.
Based on the foregoing analysis, the OIC should not be returned to the taxpayer as submitted solely to hinder or delay collection and should be processed and considered on the merits. We offer no opinion as to whether the OIC should be rejected as not in the best interest of the United States based on public policy or other considerations.
If you have any additional questions or require further guidance, please do not hesitate to contact myself or the [Redacted Text].

T.C. Memo. 2010-58
DOUGLAS D. AND BRENDA D. CHILD, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
OPINION
The inquiry into whether a transaction has economic substance focuses on (1) whether the transaction at issue had any practical economic consequences other than the creation of tax benefits and (2) whether the taxpayer had a valid business purpose or profit motive. ACM Pship. v. Commissioner , 157 F.3d 231, 247-248 (3d Cir. 1998), affg. on this issue T.C. Memo. 1997-115. The taxpayer bears the burden of proving that the challenged transaction was not a sham transaction lacking economic substance. Rule 142(a); Sheldon v. Commissioner , 94 T.C. 738, 753 (1990).
Respondent argues that petitioners are not entitled to deduct the “premium” payments to Commonwealth because the insurance arrangement lacked economic substance. We must first determine, therefore, whether petitioner's arrangement with Commonwealth was a true insurance arrangement with practical economic consequences. There is no clear set of criteria for determining whether an insurance arrangement exists and this Court will consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Commissioner , 972 F.2d 858, 864 (7th Cir. 1992), affg. in part and revg. in part 96 T.C. 61 (1991).
Historically and commonly insurance involves risk-shifting and risk-distributing. Helvering v. Le Gierse , 312 U.S. 531, 539 (1941). Shifting risk entails the transfer of the impact of a potential loss from the insured to the insurer. Clougherty Packing Co. v. Commissioner , 84 T.C. 948, 958 (1985), affd. 811 F.2d 1297 (9th Cir. 1987). If the insured has shifted its risk to the insurer, then a loss by or a claim against the insured does not affect it because the loss is offset by the proceeds of an insurance payment. Id. An insurance premium is generally the cost for shifting risk. See id.
Petitioner's arrangement with Commonwealth was not a true insurance arrangement because it did not effectively shift or distribute any risk from petitioner to Commonwealth. The policy that petitioner argues was in effect for the years at issue limited Commonwealth's liability. Unlike the asserted $3/5 million claim limits, Commonwealth's liability was limited to the amount of premiums petitioner paid during the year of the claim. Petitioner remained liable for any claims exceeding the amount of premiums. Commonwealth never assumed the risk for claims exceeding the premium payments, nor did petitioner and Commonwealth distribute the risk to other parties. We find telling that Commonwealth never paid any claim during any of the years at issue nor for that matter was the alleged policy to cover any claims not already covered under petitioner's claims made policies. We therefore find that petitioner's arrangement with Commonwealth was not a true insurance arrangement with practical economic consequences.
We find instead that the only economic consequence of petitioner's arrangement with Commonwealth was the creation of tax benefits. Petitioner avoided taxation by transferring income disguised as “premium” payments to Commonwealth, an offshore entity. The premium payment amount was based on the amount petitioner sought to shelter from income rather than on the cost of shifting risk. Petitioner was able to further reduce his tax liability by claiming a deduction for the alleged premium payments. Moreover, the arrangement with Commonwealth followed Evanson's fraudulent insurance expense scheme, further indicating that its main purpose was to avoid taxation. We find therefore that the Commonwealth transaction was a sham transaction lacking any economic substance. Accordingly, we hold that petitioner is not entitled to deduct any “premium” payments to Commonwealth for 1997 through 2003.
II. Deductibility of Home Equity Loan Interest Payments
We now turn to the deductibility of interest paid on the Cottonwood home equity loan. Despite a prohibition against deducting personal interest, a taxpayer may deduct interest paid on a mortgage on real property of which he or she is the legal or equitable owner, provided it is qualified residence interest. 3 See sec. 163(h) .
Respondent argues that petitioners are not entitled to deduct the payments to Cottonwood because the home equity loan arrangement was a sham. We agree. The Cottonwood home equity loan did not have any practical economic consequences other than tax benefits. We find instead that the home equity loan was not a legitimate home equity loan. First, the amount of the Cottonwood loan was never tied to the “home equity” of petitioners' property and petitioners were able to borrow in excess of the credit limit without providing updated financial information or an updated property appraisal. Petitioners also did not pay off the loan when they sold the property, which is the quintessential antithesis of normal business practices. Second, neither petitioners nor Cottonwood followed standard protocols with a mortgage. Cottonwood never filed a formal deed of trust or a notice of default against petitioner, and petitioners did not disclose the home equity loan on either the Bank of Utah or the Market Street loan application. Finally, the loan advances were actually repatriation of amounts petitioners paid under the fraudulent insurance expense method.
We find that the sole economic consequence of the Cottonwood arrangement was the generation of mortgage interest deductions. The interest rate on the Cottonwood home equity loan was almost double the interest rate on petitioners' other residential loans to generate a larger deduction. Furthermore, the arrangement followed Evanson's fraudulent insurance expense scheme for avoiding taxation. Accordingly, we find that the Cottonwood home equity loan lacked economic substance aside from generating tax benefits and that petitioners therefore are not entitled to deduct any “home equity loan interest” payments to Cottonwood during the years at issue.
III. Unreported Taxable Income for 2002 and 2003
We now address whether petitioner failed to report the amounts of gross income for 2002 and 2003 that respondent determined under the bank account deposits method. Gross income generally includes all income from whatever source derived. Sec. 61(a) . Taxpayers must keep adequate books and records from which their correct tax liability can be determined. Sec. 6001 . When a taxpayer fails to keep records, the Commissioner has discretion to reconstruct the taxpayer's income by any reasonable means. Sec. 446(b) ; Erickson v. Commissioner , 937 F.2d 1548, 1553 (10th Cir. 1991), affg. T.C. Memo. 1989-552; Factor v. Commissioner , 281 F.2d 100, 117 (9th Cir. 1960), affg. T.C. Memo. 1958-94.
We have previously approved the use of the bank deposits method as a means of income reconstruction. Clayton v. Commissioner , 102 T.C. 632, 645 (1994); DiLeo v. Commissioner , 96 T.C. 858, 867 (1991), affd. 959 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992). The bank deposits method assumes that all money deposited into a taxpayer's bank account during a particular period constitutes taxable income. Clayton v. Commissioner , supra at 645. The Commissioner must take into account, however, any known nontaxable source or deductible expense. Id. at 645-646. The taxpayer bears the burden of demonstrating that the Commissioner's determination is erroneous. Mallette Bros. Constr. Co. v. United States , 695 F.2d 145, 148-149 (5th Cir. 1983); Kling v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 2001-78; Seidenfeld v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1995-61.
Respondent determined through bank deposits analysis that petitioners failed to report taxable deposits in 2002 and 2003. Petitioners claim that the deposits were interaccount transfers or other nontaxable deposits, such as refunds and reimbursements. In keeping with petitioners' failure to maintain adequate records to substantiate the Evanson's transactions, petitioners did not produce the receipts or otherwise present any books, records, or other testimony that would support this assertion. The only evidence petitioner presented identifying the deposits at issue was documents that petitioner prepared himself. 4 Petitioners produced no corroborating evidence other than petitioner's own self-serving testimony, which we are not required to accept, and which we do not, in fact, find to be credible. See Niedringhaus v. Commissioner , 99 T.C. 202, 219 (1992). We therefore find that petitioners have failed to meet their burden, and we sustain respondent's determination that petitioners failed to report income in the amounts respondent determined for 2002 and 2003.
IV. Section 6663 Fraud Penalty
We next consider whether petitioner is liable for the section 6663 fraud penalties. Fraud is an intentional wrongdoing on the part of the taxpayer with the specific purpose of evading a tax believed to be owing. Edelson v. Commissioner , 829 F.2d 828, 833 (9th Cir. 1987), affg. T.C. Memo. 1986-223; Akland v. Commissioner , 767 F.2d 618, 621 (9th Cir. 1985), affg. T.C. Memo. 1983-249. A penalty equal to 75 percent of the underpayment will be imposed if any part of the taxpayer's underpayment of Federal ncome tax is due to fraud. See sec. 6663(a) . Further, if any portion of the underpayment is attributable to fraud, the entire underpayment will be treated as attributable to fraud unless the taxpayer establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that part of the underpayment is not due to fraud. Sec. 6663(b) .
Respondent has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that an underpayment exists for each of the years in issue and that some portion of the underpayment is due to fraud. See sec. 7454(a) ; Rule 142(b). Fraud is never presumed but must be established by independent evidence that establishes fraudulent intent. Edelson v. Commissioner , supra at 832; Beaver v. Commissioner , 55 T.C. 85, 92 (1970). Courts have developed several indicia, or “badges of fraud,” from which fraudulent intent can be inferred. They include: (1) understating income; (2) maintaining inadequate records; (3) engaging in a pattern of behavior that indicates an intent to mislead; (4) concealing assets; (5) providing implausible or inconsistent explanations of behavior; (6) filing false documents; and (7) failing to provide documents to the Commissioner during examination. Bradford v. Commissioner , 796 F.2d 303, 307 (9th Cir. 1986), affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-601; Cooley v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 2004-49. Although no single factor is necessarily sufficient to establish fraud, a combination of several of these factors may be persuasive evidence of fraud. Bradford v. Commissioner , supra at 307-308; Solomon v. Commissioner , 732 F.2d 1459, 1461 (6th Cir. 1984), affg. per curiam T.C. Memo. 1982-603; Niedringhaus v. Commissioner , supra at 211.
We now apply these criteria to petitioner's situation to determine whether there are any badges of fraud. First, petitioner's nonreporting of income and claiming of sham deductions resulted in an underpayment for each of the years at issue. We find petitioner's nonreporting of income and overstating deductions to be indicia of fraud.
Additionally, petitioner failed to maintain adequate records to substantiate the income as well as the deductions. Petitioner failed to produce documents to substantiate the taxable deposits at issue. He also failed to produce all insurance policies that were in effect during the years at issue, including claims made policies, despite respondent's issuance of a subpoena. Petitioner argues that the Commonwealth policy was unwritten and could be modified orally in contrast to his claims made policies, which required changes to be in writing. We find it hard to believe that petitioner would have relied on an unwritten policy with Commonwealth particularly given the substantial amounts of the “premium” payments. Equally telling is the lack of records for the inflated home equity loan arrangement. Petitioner brazenly claimed “interest” deductions on a home equity loan that had exceeded the $50,000 credit limit. We find petitioner's failure to maintain adequate records to be an indicium of fraud.
The sham transactions petitioner participated in were designed by Evanson to mislead the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) into treating otherwise taxable income as nontaxable. In fact, Evanson was convicted of tax evasion for organizing and promoting the transactions. As part of Evanson's tax evasion schemes, petitioner made payments disguised as insurance premiums to an offshore entity. The funds were returned to him disguised as loan advances to avoid taxation. Petitioner further reduced or eliminated his taxable income by claiming sham deductions from the transactions. The tax evasion schemes also enabled petitioner to conceal income. Petitioner had amounts credited on Medcap's offshore accounts that matched the “premium” payments he had made to Commonwealth. We find that petitioner participated in Evanson's schemes to mislead the IRS and conceal assets and that his participation is an indicium of fraud.
Petitioner also provided implausible explanations of his behavior in an attempt to conceal the fraudulent nature of the Evanson's transactions. For example, petitioner claimed that the Commonwealth policy provided supplemental insurance even though the policy was unwritten and failed to provide coverage beyond his existing claims made coverage. Petitioner was unable to explain how he could receive loan advances on the Cottonwood home equity arrangement in excess of the credit limit without providing updated financial information and without Cottonwood's filing a notice of default. We find petitioner's implausible explanations to be indicia of fraud.
Petitioner filed false documents when he failed to report the Cottonwood home equity loan on loan applications submitted to Bank of Utah and Market Street in 2002 and 2003, respectively. Petitioner claims that his failures to disclose the Cottonwood home equity loan on both documents were inadvertent oversights and that someone else prepared the paperwork. He asks us to ignore his obligation to verify the accuracy of the documents before he signed them under penalties of perjury. We are not disposed to turn a blind eye to such oversights, especially when a tax scheme is being used to inflate deductions and deflate income. We find petitioner's failure to disclose the Cottonwood home equity loan to be an indicium of fraud.
Finally, petitioner did not respond to a subpoena issued by respondent. We find petitioner's failure to cooperate with respondent to be a further indicium of fraud.
Most of the badges of fraud upon which this Court customarily relies are present in this case. Respondent has also established that petitioner received unreported income and claimed false deductions and that the nondisclosure of the income and the claiming of sham deductions resulted in an underpayment for each of the years at issue. Considering all the facts and circumstances, we find that respondent has proven by clear and convincing evidence that petitioner fraudulently intended to evade taxes. Accordingly, petitioner is liable for the section 6663 fraud penalties for the years at issue.
Because of our holding regarding the fraud penalties under section 6663 , we need not address whether petitioner is liable for the accuracy-related penalties under section 6662 .
We have considered all other arguments in rendering our decision and to the extent they are not mentioned, we find them to be irrelevant, moot or meritless.
To reflect respondent's concessions,
An appropriate decision will be entered .
Footnotes

1
All numerical amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.
2
Respondent argues alternatively that petitioners are liable for the sec. 6662 accuracy-related penalties for taxable years 1995 through 2003. Respondent concedes that petitioner wife is not liable for the sec. 6663 fraud penalties. Respondent further concedes that petitioner wife is not liable for the sec. 6662 accuracy-related penalties if petitioner husband is found liable for the fraud penalties. Because we find that petitioner husband is liable for the fraud penalties, petitioner wife is not liable for either the fraud or the accuracy-related penalties.
3
Qualified residence interest is any interest paid or accrued during the taxable year on acquisition indebtedness or home equity indebtedness. See sec. 163(h)(3) . Home equity indebtedness is any indebtedness secured by the qualified residence of the taxpayer to the extent the aggregate amount of such indebtedness does not exceed the fair market value of the qualified residence reduced by the amount of acquisition indebtedness on the residence. See sec. 163(h)(3)(C)(i) .

4
Petitioner produced at trial evidence that had already been factored into respondent's bank deposit analysis as nontaxable deposits.

Proposed regs provide guidance on tax return preparers' identifying number requirements
Preamble to Prop Reg 03/24/2010 , Prop Reg § 1.6109-2
IRS has issued proposed regs under Code Sec. 6109 that would provide guidance to tax return preparers on furnishing an identifying number on tax returns and claims for refund of tax that they prepare. Under the proposed regs, which would be effective when final regs are issued, tax return preparers would have to apply for and regularly renew their preparer identifying number as IRS may prescribe in forms, instructions, or other guidance. The proposed regs describe how IRS will define tax return preparers' identifying number and invite public comments on this guidance. IRS has issued proposed regs under Code Sec. 6109 that would provide guidance to tax return preparers on furnishing an identifying number on tax returns and claims for refund of tax that they prepare. Under the proposed regs, tax return preparers would have to apply for and regularly renew their preparer identifying number as IRS may prescribe in forms, instructions, or other guidance.
Background. Under Code Sec. 6109(a)(4) , any return or claim for refund prepared by a tax return preparer must include the identifying number for securing the proper identification of the preparer, his employer or both. Reg. § 1.6109-2(a)(2) provides that the identifying number of an individual tax return preparer is that individual's social security account number, or such alternative number as may be prescribed by IRS in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance.
At the end of 2009, IRS released a 50-page study on the U.S. return preparer industry which carries detailed recommendations for new standards (registration, competency testing, continuing education, ethical standards), see Weekly Alert ¶ 31 01/07/2010 ). See Publication 4832, Return Preparer Review (Rev. 12-2009).
Click here for IRS's “Return Preparer Review.”
Proposed regs. The proposed regs would provide that the identifying number of a tax return preparer is exclusively the number prescribed by the IRS. The proposed regs would also implement some of the recommendations made in the Return Preparer Review. Because an identifying number is unique to the person to whom assigned, IRS would be able to use the number to correctly identify the taxpayer or the tax return preparer. The use of identifying numbers would allow IRS to accurately and timely process returns and issue refunds, centralize information, post information to the correct taxpayer's account, and effectively administer the rules relating to tax return preparers.
The proposed regs would provide that for tax returns or refund claims filed after Dec. 31, 2010, the identifying number that a tax return preparer must include with the preparer's signature on tax returns and refund claims is that prescribed by IRS in forms, instructions, or other guidance. Tax return preparers would not be able to use a Social Security Number (SSN) as a preparer identifying number unless specifically prescribed by IRS in forms, instructions, or other guidance. Instead, to the extent provided in forms and instructions, a tax return preparer would be required to use a preparer tax identification number (PTIN) as the identifying number unless IRS prescribes in the future a replacement to the PTIN.
For tax returns or claims for refund filed before Jan. 1, 2011, a tax return preparer's identifying number would remain the preparer's SSN or PTIN. For tax returns for tax periods ending before Jan. 1, 2011, and made on the appropriate forms prescribed for the tax periods, but which are filed on or after Jan. 1, 2011, tax return preparers would have to furnish on the returns the identifying number prescribed on the forms to be filed and in associated instructions.
For tax return preparation businesses and other persons having an employment arrangement or association with a tax return preparer, the business's or employer's employer identification number (EIN) would continue to be the identifying number that must be included on tax returns and refund claims along with the tax return preparer's signature and preparer identifying number. An individual tax return preparer, however, could not use an EIN as a preparer identifying number on a return, even if the preparer has an EIN (for example, as a sole proprietor).
Tax return preparers who use their SSN, or an EIN, Electronic Filing Identification Number (EFIN, an identification number assigned to IRS e-file providers), or an Electronic Transmitter Identification Number (ETIN, an identification number assigned to IRS e-file providers who electronically transmit tax returns to IRS), instead of a valid PTIN, on tax returns or claims for refund filed after the effective date would be subject to the penalty under Code Sec. 6695(c) unless the failure to include a valid PTIN was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
Under the proposed regs, all tax return preparers would have to apply for a PTIN or other prescribed identifying number at the time and in the manner as may be prescribed by IRS in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance. IRS would also be authorized to prescribe a user fee in connection with applying for, and renewing, a PTIN (or successor number similar to a PTIN). Except as provided in any transitional period, beginning after Dec. 31, 2010, to obtain a PTIN, an individual would have to be an attorney, certified public accountant (CPA), enrolled agent, or registered tax return preparer under future guidance to be provided in Circular 230.
For purposes of applying for and renewing a PTIN or other prescribed preparer identifying number, the term “tax return preparer” would mean any individual who is compensated for preparing, or assisting in the preparation of, all or substantially all, of a tax return or claim for refund of tax. A tax return preparer would not include an individual who was not otherwise a tax return preparer under Reg. § 301.7701-15(b)(2) , or who is an individual described in Reg. § 301.7701-15(f) .
As part of the process of applying for a PTIN, a tax return preparer may be subject to both an initial tax-compliance check and subsequent periodic checks, which could include a review of a preparer's history of compliance with personal and business tax filing and payment obligations.
References: For who is a tax return preparer, see FTC 2d/FIN ¶ S-1117 ; United States Tax Reporter ¶ 77,014.24 ; TaxDesk ¶ 867,002 ; TG ¶ 71753 . For the return preparer penalty, see FTC 2d/FIN ¶ V-2631 ; United States Tax Reporter ¶ 66,944 ; TaxDesk ¶ 867,019 ; TG ¶ 71769 .
REG-134235-08.
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations under section 6109 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) that provide guidance to tax return preparers on furnishing an identifying number on tax returns and claims for refund of tax that they prepare. These proposed regulations provide guidance on the identifying number of a tax return preparer for tax returns and claims for refund filed before and after the proposed effective date. The proposed regulations describe how the IRS will define the identifying number of tax return preparers. Additional provisions of the proposed regulations provide that tax return preparers must apply for and regularly renew their preparer identifying number as the IRS may prescribe in forms, instructions, or other guidance. This document also invites comments from the public regarding these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by April 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-134235-08), room 5205, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be handdelivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-134235-08), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, or sent electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (IRS—REG-134235-08).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations, Stuart Murray at (202) 622-4940(not a toll-free number); concerning submissions of comments and requests for a hearing, Richard Hurst at richard.a.hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information contained in this notice of proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)). Comments on the collection of information should be sent to the Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503, with copies to the Internal Revenue Service, Attn: IRS Reports Clearance Officer, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC 20224. Comments on the collection of information should be received by April 23, 2010.
Comments are specifically requested concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the IRS, including whether the information will have practical utility;
The accuracy of the estimated burden associated with the proposed collection of information (see below);
How the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected may be enhanced;
How the burden of complying with the proposed collections of information may be minimized, including through the application of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and
Estimates of capital or start-up costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of service to provide information.
The collection of information in these proposed regulations is in §1.6109-2(d) and (e). This information is required in order for the IRS to issue identifying numbers to tax return preparers who are eligible to receive them. Tax return preparers will need to apply for an identifying number as prescribed in forms, instructions, or other guidance. The use of a prescribed identifying number by tax return preparers on tax returns and claims for refund of tax will enable the IRS to accurately identify tax return preparers, to match tax return preparers to tax returns and claims for refund that they prepare, and to generally administer the internal revenue laws. The collection of information is mandatory. The likely respondents are tax return preparers and employers of tax return preparers.
Estimated total annual reporting burden: 300,000 hours.
Estimated average annual burden hours (or fraction of an hour) per respondent: varies from 10 to 20 minutes, with an estimated average of 15 minutes.
Estimated number of respondents: 1.2 million.
Estimated annual frequency of responses: once every three years.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget.
Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
Background
This document contains proposed amendments to regulations under section 6109 of the Code relating to furnishing a tax return preparer's identifying number on tax returns and claims for refund of tax. Section 6109 was added to the Code in 1961 (Public Law 87-397, 75 Stat. 828) and authorizes the Secretary to prescribe regulations for the inclusion of identifying numbers on a return, statement, or other document required to be filed with the IRS. In addition, section 6109(c) authorizes the Secretary “to require such information as may be necessary to assign an identifying number to any person.” Section 6109(a)(4) as originally enacted by section 1203(d) of the Tax Reform Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-455, 90 Stat. 1520) required return preparers to furnish on income tax returns and claims for refund of income tax an identifying number, as prescribed, to identify the preparer, the preparer's employer, or both. Section 8246(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-28, 121 Stat. 112), amended section 6109(a)(4) to allow the IRS to prescribe that tax return preparers furnish identifying numbers on any tax returns or claims for refund they prepare. As currently prescribed in regulations, the identifying number of a tax return preparer who is an individual is the preparer's social security number (SSN) or alternative number as prescribed by the IRS. The proposed regulations provide that the identifying number of a tax return preparer is exclusively the number prescribed by the IRS. The proposed regulations will implement some of the recommendations made in Publication 4832, Return Preparer Review (Rev. 12-2009), published at the end of last year (the Report). The IRS and the Treasury Department believe that the implementation of the Report's recommendations, including the recommendations implemented by these regulations, will increase tax compliance and allow taxpayers to be confident that the tax return preparers to whom they turn for assistance are knowledgeable, skilled, and ethical.
1. Identifying Numbers Generally
Because an identifying number is unique to the person to whom assigned, the IRS is able to use the number to correctly identify the taxpayer or the tax return preparer. The use of identifying numbers allows the IRS to accurately and timely process returns and issue refunds, centralize information, post information to the correct taxpayer's account, and effectively administer the rules relating to tax return preparers.
2. Requiring Identifying Numbers from Tax Return Preparers
Tax return preparers generally must provide an identifying number on the tax returns they prepare and sign. Specifically, under §1.6695-1(b), a signing tax return preparer, as defined under §301.7701-15(b)(1), must sign a return of tax or claim for refund after it is completed and before it is presented to the taxpayer for signature. A signing tax return preparer under §301.7701-15(b)(1) is a tax return preparer who has primary responsibility for the overall substantive accuracy of the preparation of a return of tax or claim for refund.
Under §1.6109-2(a)(1), a tax return preparer who must sign a tax return or tax refund claim must also include an identifying number with the preparer's signature. A return of tax includes an information return described in §301.7701- 15(b)(4). If a signing tax return preparer has an employment arrangement or association with another person, then that other person's employer identification number (EIN) must also be included on the tax return or refund claim.
The identifying number of a signing tax return preparer, and the identifying number of any person with whom the preparer has an employment arrangement or association, must be included on electronically filed tax returns, as well as paper returns. Further, because of recent statutory changes, tax return preparers who prepare and file individual income tax returns (Form Series 1040) for their clients will soon be required to electronically file the returns, unless the tax return preparer reasonably expects to file only 10 or fewer individual income tax returns for the calendar year. See Section 17 of the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009, Public Law 111-92, 123 Stat. 2984, 2997 (adding Code section 6011(e)(3)).
Tax return preparers who are required but fail to include their identifying number on a tax return or refund claim, or fail to include the identifying number of any person with whom they have an employment arrangement or association, are subject to a penalty under section 6695(c). A tax return preparer is not liable for the penalty if the failure to include an identifying number is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
3. Preparer Tax Identification Numbers
Section 6109(a) initially provided that the identifying number of a tax return preparer was the individual's SSN. Section 3710(a) of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-206, 112 Stat. 685) (RRA '98), allowed the IRS to prescribe an identifying number for tax return preparers other than the preparer's SSN. In response to section 3710(a) of RRA '98, the IRS developed and began to issue preparer tax identification numbers (PTINs). Tax return preparers currently may apply online for a PTIN using the e-services PTIN process on the IRS website at www.irs.gov or by filing Form W-7P, “Application for Preparer Tax Identification Number.” Applying online is faster, and return preparers are encouraged to apply online. In the future, the IRS will prescribe the method to apply for a PTIN consistent with these proposed regulations. Currently, under §1.6109-2(a)(2), a tax return preparer may use as an identifying number on a tax return or claim for refund either the preparer's SSN or an “alternative number” prescribed by the IRS, including a PTIN. But an EIN, an Electronic Filing Identification Number (EFIN) (which is an identification number assigned to IRS e-file providers), or an Electronic Transmitter Identification Number (ETIN) (which is an identification number assigned to IRS e-file providers who electronically transmit tax returns to the IRS) is not a valid preparer identifying number.
4. Regulation of Tax Return Preparers
In June 2009, the IRS initiated a comprehensive review of tax return preparers, and in December 2009 the IRS published the Report describing its findings from that review. The Report recommended, in part, that tax return preparers be required to obtain and use a PTIN as the exclusive preparer identifying number and undergo a tax-compliance check. As discussed below, the proposed regulations implement those recommendations.
Under current law, any individual may prepare a tax return or claim for refund. The Report recommended that the IRS establish new eligibility standards that an individual must meet in order to prepare tax returns— including testing, continuing education, and tax compliance checks. The Report contemplates that only attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents, as well as tax return preparers who pass a minimum competency exam and meet other requirements (referred to as “registered tax return preparers”) will be eligible to prepare and sign tax returns and claims for refund. These proposed regulations do not establish the requirements to become a registered tax return preparer, which primarily will be set forth in future guidance under Treasury Department Circular No. 230, 31 CFR Part 10. After a transition period, however, it is intended that only individuals who satisfy the eligibility standards may obtain and use a PTIN as a tax return preparer.
Explanation of Provisions
1. Requiring the Use of PTINs
The proposed regulations provide that for tax returns or refund claims filed after December 31, 2010, the identifying number that a tax return preparer must include with the preparer's signature on tax returns and refund claims is that prescribed by the IRS in forms, instructions, or other guidance. Tax return preparers will not be able to use an SSN as a preparer identifying number unless specifically prescribed by the IRS in forms, instructions, or other guidance. Instead, to the extent provided in forms and instructions, a tax return preparer will be required to use a PTIN as the identifying number unless the IRS prescribes in the future a replacement to the PTIN. Forms and instructions will be revised accordingly. The use of PTINs as the identifying number for tax return preparers will improve tax administration and tax compliance, benefit taxpayers and tax return preparers, and help maintain the confidentiality of SSNs.
For tax returns or claims for refund filed before January 1, 2011, the identifying number of a tax return preparer will remain the preparer's SSN or PTIN. In the case of tax returns for taxable periods ending before January 1, 2011, and made on the appropriate forms prescribed for the taxable periods, but which are filed on or after January 1, 2011, tax return preparers must furnish on the returns the identifying number prescribed on the forms to be filed and in associated instructions.
For tax return preparation businesses and other persons having an employment arrangement or association with a tax return preparer, the business's or employer's EIN continues to be the identifying number that must be included on tax returns and refund claims along with the tax return preparer's signature and preparer identifying number. An individual tax return preparer, however, may not use an EIN as a preparer identifying number on a return, even if the preparer has an EIN (for example, as a sole proprietor). Tax return preparers who use their SSN, or an EIN, EFIN, or ETIN, instead of a valid PTIN, on tax returns or claims for refund filed after the effective date may be subject to the penalty under section 6695(c) unless the failure to include a valid PTIN is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
2. Eligibility to Receive a PTIN
The proposed regulations provide that all tax return preparers must apply for a PTIN or other prescribed identifying number at the time and in the manner as may be prescribed by the IRS in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance. The proposed regulations also authorize the IRS to prescribe a user fee in connection with applying for, and renewing, a PTIN (or successor number similar to a PTIN). Except as provided in any transitional period, beginning after December 31, 2010, to obtain a PTIN, an individual must be an attorney, certified public accountant, enrolled agent, or registered tax return preparer under future guidance to be provided in Circular 230.
Only for purposes of applying for and renewing a PTIN or other prescribed preparer identifying number, the term tax return preparer means any individual who is compensated for preparing, or assisting in the preparation of, all or substantially all, of a tax return or claim for refund of tax. A tax return preparer does not include an individual who is not otherwise a tax return preparer as that term is defined in §301.7701-15(b)(2), or who is an individual described in §301.7701-15(f). The proposed regulations provide several examples illustrating who is a tax return preparer required to apply for a PTIN.
As part of the process of applying for a PTIN, a tax return preparer may be subject to both an initial tax-compliance check and subsequent periodic checks, which could include a review of a preparer's history of compliance with personal and business tax filing and payment obligations. The tax-compliance check is intended to establish whether a tax return preparer has timely filed required personal and business tax returns and has paid taxes that are due or made other acceptable arrangements with the IRS, such as an approved installment agreement under section 6159. If a tax return preparer disregards any applicable requirements to obtain a prescribed identifying number and thereafter omits, when required to include, a valid identifying number on a tax return or claim for refund filed after the effective date, the preparer may be liable for the section 6695(c) penalty, unless the failure to include a valid identifying number was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
The information a tax return preparer provides when the preparer initially applies for a PTIN or other prescribed identifying number will often become outdated or otherwise inaccurate. The IRS may require tax return preparers to regularly renew their identifying numbers and otherwise maintain updated information with the IRS. If a tax return preparer who is required to include an identifying number on a tax return or claim for refund filed after the effective date uses an expired identifying number, the tax return preparer may be liable for the section 6695(c) penalty, unless the use of the expired number was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
The proposed regulations provide that if necessary for effective tax administration, the IRS may prescribe exceptions to any of the requirements, such as for an interim period while procedures are being implemented. For example, the IRS and the Treasury Department recognize that the procedures for becoming a registered tax return preparer may not be fully implemented when these regulations become effective. It is anticipated that transitional interim guidance will be provided to allow individuals who intend to become registered tax return preparers to obtain an interim PTIN or other interim identifying number that may be used as a preparer identifying number on tax returns and refund claims until the procedures are fully implemented. After the interim period, however, to obtain a PTIN, an individual will need to be an attorney, certified public accountant, enrolled agent, or registered tax return preparer authorized to practice before the IRS under Circular 230.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are effective after the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has also been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations.
It has been determined that an initial regulatory flexibility analysis under 5 U.S.C. 603 is required for this notice of proposed rulemaking. The analysis is set forth below under the heading, "Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis."
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small business.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
When an agency issues a rulemaking proposal, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) requires the agency to “prepare and make available for public comment an initial regulatory flexibility analysis” that “describe[s] the impact of the proposed rule on small entities.” 5 U.S.C. 603(a). Section 605 of the Act provides an exception to this requirement if the agency certifies that the proposed rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. A small entity is defined as a small business, small nonprofit organization, or small governmental jurisdiction. 5 U.S.C. 601(3)-(6). The IRS and the Treasury Department conclude that the proposed regulations, if promulgated (together with other contemplated guidance provided for in these regulations), will impact a substantial number of small entities and the economic impact will be significant. As a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Description of the reasons why the agency action is being considered.
Taxpayers' reliance on paid tax return preparers has grown steadily in recent decades. Today, paid tax return preparers assist a majority of U.S. taxpayers in meeting their income tax filing obligations. Beyond preparing tax returns, tax return preparers also help educate taxpayers about the tax laws, and facilitate electronic filing. Tax return preparers provide advice to taxpayers, identify items or issues for which the law or guidance is unclear, and inform taxpayers of the benefits and risks of positions taken on a tax return, and the tax treatment or reporting of items and transactions. Competent tax return preparers who are well educated in the rules and subject matter of their field can prevent costly errors, potentially saving a taxpayer from unwanted problems later on and relieving the IRS from expending valuable examination and collection resources.
Given the important role that tax return preparers play in Federal tax administration, the IRS has a significant interest in being able to accurately identify tax return preparers and monitor their tax return preparation activities. The proposed regulations are intended to advance tax administration by requiring all individuals who are paid to prepare all or substantially all of a tax return or claim for refund of tax to obtain a preparer identifying number prescribed by the IRS. Pursuant to the proposed regulations, the IRS will require individuals who sign tax returns or claims for refund to report the preparer's identifying number on a tax return or claim for refund when the return or refund claim is signed. The proposed regulations also provide that the IRS may require tax return preparers to apply for, and regularly renew, their identifying numbers. Under the proposed regulations, the IRS may prescribe a user fee payable when applying for a number and for renewal.
Further, the IRS and the Treasury Department conclude that taxpayers, tax return preparers, and overall tax administration will be best served through increased oversight of the tax return preparer industry. Mandating a single prescribed identifying number for all tax return preparers and assigning a prescribed number to registered tax return preparers is critical to effective oversight.
Statement of the objectives of, and the legal basis for, the proposed rule.
The principal objective of the proposed regulations is to enable the IRS to more accurately identify tax return preparers and the tax returns and refund claims associated with each tax return preparer. The proposed regulations do this by providing that the IRS may prescribe the use of identifying numbers for tax return preparers and the qualifications or other requirements necessary to obtain a valid number. The legal basis for these provisions is section 6109 of the Code, which authorizes the Secretary to prescribe the “identifying number for securing proper identification of” a tax return preparer and “to require such information as may be necessary to assign an identifying number to any person.”
Description and estimate (where feasible) of the number of small entities subject to the proposed rule.
The proposed regulations apply to individuals who prepare tax returns and claims for refund of tax. The estimated number of paid tax return preparers is as high as 1.2 million, which means the proposed regulations are likely to impact a large number of individuals. Most paid tax return preparers are employed by firms. A substantial number of paid tax return preparers are employed at small tax return preparation firms or are self-employed tax return preparers. Any economic impact of these regulations on small entities generally will be on selfemployed tax return preparers who prepare and sign tax returns or on small businesses that employ one or more individuals who sign tax returns.
The appropriate NAICS codes for tax return preparers are those for tax return preparation services (NAICS code 541213) and other accounting services (NAICS code 541219). Entities identified under either of these two codes are considered small under the Small Business Administration's size standards (13 CFR 121.201), if their annual revenue is less than $7 million or $8.5 million, respectively. The IRS estimates that approximately 70 to 80 percent of the individuals subject to these proposed regulations are tax return preparers operating as or employed by small entities.
Description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and related requirements of the proposed rule, including an estimate of the classes of small entities that will be subject to the requirements and the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the report or record.
The proposed regulations do not directly impose any reporting, recordkeeping, or similar requirements on any small entities. Rather, the proposed regulations provide that the IRS may prescribe in forms, instructions, or other guidance (including regulations) requirements for identifying numbers for tax return preparers, regular renewal of identifying numbers, and payment of a user fee when applying for or renewing an identifying number. In addition, other guidance may require certain tax return preparers to complete competency testing, complete continuing education courses, and adhere to established rules of practice governing attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents, enrolled actuaries, and enrolled retirement plan agents.
Applying for an identifying number and subsequent renewal will require reporting of certain information, but are not expected to require recordkeeping. These activities also will not require the purchase or use of any special business equipment or software. To the extent it will be necessary to apply for a PTIN (or similar identifying number that replaces a PTIN) online at www.irs.gov, most if not all tax return preparation businesses have computers and Internet access. The IRS estimates that applying for a PTIN will take 10 to 20 minutes per individual, with an average of 15 minutes per individual.
Under other guidance that the IRS may issue, tax return preparers who apply to be registered tax return preparers and who regularly renew their status may be subject to recordkeeping requirements because they may be required to maintain specified records, such as documentation and educational materials relating to completion of continuing education courses. These requirements do not involve any specific professional skills other than general recordkeeping abilities already needed to own and operate a small business or to competently act as a tax return preparer. It is estimated that tax return preparers will annually spend approximately 30 minutes to 1 hour in maintaining records relating to the continuing education requirements, depending on individual circumstances.
A separate regulation addressing reasonable user fees will be proposed in the near future. Tax return preparers may be required to pay a user fee when first applying for a PTIN and at every renewal. Small entities may be affected by these costs if the entities choose to pay some or all of these fees for their employees.
Under regulations to be issued in the future, tax return preparers may also incur costs for commercial continuing education courses and minimum competency examinations, plus incidental costs, such as for travel and accommodations in order to maintain their status as registered tax return preparers under Circular 230. Course prices can vary greatly, from free to hundreds of dollars. Many small tax return preparation firms may choose, as with the user fee, to bear these costs for their employees. In some cases, small entities may lose sales and profits while their employed tax return preparers attend training or educational classes or are studying and sitting for examinations. Some small entities that employ tax return preparers may even need to alter their business operations if a significant number of their employees cannot satisfy the necessary registration and competency requirements. The IRS and the Treasury Department conclude, however, that only a small percentage of small entities, if any, may need to cease doing business or radically change their business model due to the proposed regulations.
Although each of the reporting and recordkeeping requirements and the costs identified above (in connection with the proposed regulations and the other anticipated guidance necessary to implement the Return Preparer Review) is not expected to singly result in a significant economic impact, taken together it is anticipated that they may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant Federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the proposed rule.
The proposed regulations do not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any Federal statutes or other rules.
Description of any significant alternatives to the proposed rule that accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and minimize any significant economic impact on small entities.
The IRS and the Treasury Department have determined that there are no viable alternatives to the proposed regulations that would enable the IRS to accurately identify tax return preparers, other than through the use of a prescribed identifying number, as provided in the proposed regulations.
More broadly, the IRS received a large volume of comments as part of the Return Preparer Review on the issue of increased oversight of tax return preparers generally and on the Report's proposed recommendations, including requiring tax return preparers to use a uniform prescribed identifying number. The comments were received from all categories of interested stakeholders, including tax professional groups representing large and small entities, IRS advisory groups, tax return preparers, and the public. The input received from this large and diverse community overwhelmingly expressed support for the proposed requirements.
As to the proposed requirements recommended in the Report, the IRS and the Treasury Department considered various alternatives in determining the best ways to effectuate proposed changes with respect to tax return preparers, including:
(1) Requiring all paid tax return preparers to comply with the ethical standards in Circular 230 or an ethics code similar to Circular 230, but not requiring any paid preparers to demonstrate their qualification and competency;
(2) Requiring tax return preparers who are not currently authorized to practice before the IRS to register with the IRS, complete annual continuing education requirements, and meet certain ethical standards, but not to pass a minimum competency examination;
(3) Requiring all paid tax return preparers to pass a minimum competency examination and meet other registration requirements; and
(4) Requiring all paid tax return preparers who are not currently authorized to practice before the IRS to pass a minimum competency examination and meet other registration requirements, but “grandfather in” tax return preparers who have accurately and competently prepared tax returns for a certain period of years.
After consideration of these and other alternatives and the responses received in the public comment process, the IRS and the Treasury Department conclude that the provisions of the proposed regulations will most effectively promote sound tax administration. The provisions in the proposed regulations for a single prescribed identifying number for tax return preparers will enable the IRS to accurately identify tax return preparers, match preparers with the tax returns and claims for refund they prepare, and better administer the tax laws with respect to tax return preparers and their clients. The provisions, in combination with anticipated guidance described above, also will ensure that qualified, competent, and ethical tax return preparers will be assigned prescribed preparer identifying numbers. The testing requirements that may be set forth in other guidance will establish a benchmark of minimum competency necessary for tax return preparers to obtain their professional credentials, while the continuing education requirements are intended to ensure that tax return preparers remain current on the Federal tax laws and continue to develop their tax knowledge. The extension in other, prospective guidance of the rules in Circular 230 to any paid tax return preparer will require all practitioners to meet certain ethical standards and allow the IRS to suspend or otherwise appropriately discipline tax return preparers who engage in unethical or disreputable conduct. Accordingly, the implementation of qualification and competency standards is expected to increase tax compliance and allow taxpayers to be confident that the tax return preparers to whom they turn for assistance are knowledgeable, skilled, and ethical.
Comments and Requests for Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations, consideration will be given to any written comments (a signed original and eight (8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the IRS. The IRS and the Treasury Department request comments on the clarity of the proposed rules and how they can be made easier to understand. All comments that are submitted by the public will be available for public inspection and copying. A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any person who timely submits comments. If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date, time, and place for the public hearing will be published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed regulations is Stuart Murray of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel, Procedure and Administration.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 ***
Section 1.6109-2 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 6109(a) *** Par. 2. Section 1.6109-2 is amended by revising the section heading, revising paragraphs (a)(2) and (d), and adding paragraphs (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i) to read as follows:
Proposed Amendment 1.6109-2.
§1.6109-2 Tax return preparers furnishing identifying numbers for returns or claims for refund and related requirements.
(a) ***
(2)(i) For tax returns or claims for refund filed on or before December 31, 2010, the identifying number of an individual tax return preparer is that individual's social security number or such alternative number as may be prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance.
(ii) For tax returns or claims for refund filed after December 31, 2010, the identifying number of a tax return preparer is the individual's preparer tax identification number or such other number prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance.
*****
(d) Beginning after December 31, 2010, all tax return preparers must have a preparer tax identification number or other prescribed identifying number that was applied for and received at the time and in the manner, including the payment of a user fee, as may be prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance. Except as provided in paragraph (h) of this section, beginning after December 31, 2010, to obtain a preparer tax identification number or other prescribed identifying number, a tax return preparer must be an attorney, certified public accountant, enrolled agent, or registered tax return preparer authorized to practice before the Internal Revenue Service under 31 U.S.C. 330 and the regulations thereunder.
(e) The Internal Revenue Service may designate an expiration date for any preparer tax identification number or other prescribed identifying number and may further prescribe the time and manner for renewing a preparer tax identification number or other prescribed identifying number, including the payment of a user fee, as set forth in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance. The Internal Revenue Service may provide that any identifying number issued by the Internal Revenue Service prior to the effective date of this regulation will expire on December 31, 2010, unless properly renewed as set forth in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance, including these regulations.
(f) As may be prescribed in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance, the IRS may conduct a tax compliance check on a tax return preparer who applies for or renews a preparer tax identification number or other prescribed identifying number.
(g) Only for purposes of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, the term tax return preparer means any individual who is compensated for preparing, or assisting in the preparation of, all or substantially all of a tax return or claim for refund of tax. Factors to consider in determining whether an individual is a tax return preparer under this paragraph (g) include, but are not limited to, the complexity of the work performed by the individual relative to the overall complexity of the tax return or claim for refund of tax; the amount of the items of income, deductions, or losses attributable to the work performed by the individual relative to the total amount of income, deductions, or losses required to be correctly reported on the tax return or claim for refund of tax; and the amount of tax or credit attributable to the work performed by the individual relative to the total tax liability required to be correctly reported on the tax return or claim for refund of tax. A tax return preparer does not include an individual who is not otherwise a tax return preparer as that term is defined in §301.7701-15(b)(2), or who is an individual described in §301.7701-15(f). The provisions of this paragraph (g) are illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. Employee A, an individual employed by Tax Return Preparer B, assists Tax Return Preparer B in answering telephone calls, making copies, inputting client tax information gathered by B into the data fields of tax preparation software on a computer, and using the computer to file electronic returns of tax prepared by B. Although Employee A must exercise judgment regarding which data fields in the tax preparation software to use, A does not exercise any discretion or independent judgment as to the clients' underlying tax positions. Employee A, therefore, merely provides clerical assistance or incidental services and is not a tax return preparer required to apply for a PTIN or other identifying number as the Internal Revenue Service may prescribe in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance.
Example 2. The facts are the same as in Example 1, except that Employee A also interviews B's clients and obtains from them information needed for the preparation of tax returns. Employee A determines the amount and character of entries on the returns and whether the information provided is sufficient for purposes of preparing the returns. For at least some of B's clients, A obtains information and makes determinations that constitute all or substantially all of the tax return. Employee A is a tax return preparer required to apply for a PTIN or other identifying number as the Internal Revenue Service may prescribe in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance. Employee A is a tax return preparer even if Employee A relies on tax preparation software to prepare the return.
Example 3. C is an employee of a firm that prepares tax returns and claims for refund of tax for compensation. C is responsible for preparing a Form 1040, “U.S. Individual Income Tax Return,” for a client. C obtains the information necessary for completing the return during a meeting with the client, and makes determinations with respect to the proper application of the tax laws to the information in order to determine the client's tax liability. C completes the tax return and sends the completed return to employee D, who reviews the return for accuracy before signing it. Both C and D are tax return preparers required to apply for a PTIN or other identifying number as the Internal Revenue Service may prescribe in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance.
Example 4. E is an employee at a firm which prepares tax returns and claims for refund of tax for compensation. The firm is engaged by a corporation to prepare its Federal income tax return on Form 1120, "U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return." Among the documentation that the corporation provides to E in connection with the preparation of the tax return is documentation relating to the corporation's potential eligibility to claim a recently enacted tax credit for the taxable year. In preparing the return, and specifically for purposes of the new tax credit, E (with the corporation's consent) obtains advice from F, a subject matter expert on this and similar credits. F advises E as to the corporation's entitlement to the credit and provides his calculation of the amount of the credit. Based on this advice from F, E prepares the corporation's Form 1120 claiming the tax credit in the amount recommended by F. The additional credit is one of many tax credits and deductions claimed on the tax return, and determining the credit amount does not constitute preparation of all or substantially all of the corporation's tax return under this paragraph (g). F will not be considered to have prepared all or substantially all of the corporation's tax return, and F is not a tax return preparer required to apply for a PTIN or other identifying number as the Internal Revenue Service may prescribe in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance. The analysis is the same whether or not the tax credit is a substantial portion of the return under §301.7701-15 of this chapter, and whether or not F is in the same firm with E. E is a tax return preparer required to apply for a PTIN or other identifying number as the Internal Revenue Service may prescribe in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance.
(h) The Internal Revenue Service, through forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance, may prescribe exceptions to the requirements of this section, including the requirement that an individual be authorized to practice before the Internal Revenue Service before receiving a preparer tax identification number or other prescribed identifying number, as necessary in the interest of effective tax administration.
(i) Effective/applicability date. Paragraph (a)(2) of this section is effective for returns and claims for refund filed after the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register. Paragraphs (d) through (h) of this section are effective after the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.


§ 6109 Identifying numbers.
________________________________________
(a) WG&L Treatises Supplying of identifying numbers.
When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary:
(1) Inclusion in returns.
Any person required under the authority of this title to make a return, statement, or other document shall include in such return, statement, or other document such identifying number as may be prescribed for securing proper identification of such person.
(2) Furnishing number to other persons.
Any person with respect to whom a return, statement, or other document is required under the authority of this title to be made by another person or whose identifying number is required to be shown on a return of another person shall furnish to such other person such identifying number as may be prescribed for securing his proper identification.
(3) Furnishing number of another person.
Any person required under the authority of this title to make a return, statement, or other document with respect to another person shall request from such other person, and shall include in any such return, statement, or other document, such identifying number as may be prescribed for securing proper identification of such other person.
(4) Furnishing identifying number of tax return preparer.
Any return or claim for refund prepared by a tax return preparer shall bear such identifying number for securing proper identification of such preparer, his employer, or both, as may be prescribed. For purposes of this paragraph, the terms “return” and “claim for refund” have the respective meanings given to such terms by section 6696(e) .

For purposes of paragraphs (1) , (2) , and (3) , the identifying number of an individual (or his estate) shall be such individual's social security account number.
(b) Limitation.
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) , a return of any person with respect to his liability for tax, or any statement or other document in support thereof, shall not be considered for purposes of paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (a) as a return, statement, or other document with respect to another person.
(2) For purposes of paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (a) , a return of an estate or trust with respect to its liability for tax, and any statement or other document in support thereof, shall be considered as a return, statement, or other document with respect to each beneficiary of such estate or trust.
(c) Requirement of information.
For purposes of this section , the Secretary is authorized to require such information as may be necessary to assign an identifying number to any person.
(d) Use of social security account number.
The social security account number issued to an individual for purposes of section 205(c)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act shall, except as shall otherwise be specified under regulations of the Secretary, be used as the identifying number for such individual for purposes of this title.
(e) Repealed.
(f) Access to employer identification numbers by Secretary of Agriculture for purposes of Food and Nutrition Act of 2008.
(1) In general.
In the administration of section 9 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 ( 7 U.S.C. 2018 ) involving the determination of the qualifications of applicants under such Act, the Secretary of Agriculture may, subject to this subsection , require each applicant retail store or wholesale food concern to furnish to the Secretary of Agriculture the employer identification number assigned to the store or concern pursuant to this section . The Secretary of Agriculture shall not have access to any such number for any purpose other than the establishment and maintenance of a list of the names and employer identification numbers of the stores and concerns for use in determining those applicants who have been previously sanctioned or convicted under section 12 or 15 of such Act ( 7 U.S.C. 2021 or 2024 ).
(2) Sharing of information and safeguards.
(A) Sharing of information. The Secretary of Agriculture may share any information contained in any list referred to in paragraph (1) with any other agency or instrumentality of the United States which otherwise has access to employer identification numbers in accordance with this section or other applicable Federal law, except that the Secretary of Agriculture may share such information only to the extent that such Secretary determines such sharing would assist in verifying and matching such information against information maintained by such other agency or instrumentality. Any such information shared pursuant to this subparagraph may be used by such other agency or instrumentality only for the purpose of effective administration and enforcement of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 or for the purpose of investigation of violations of other Federal laws or enforcement of such laws.
(B) Safeguards. The Secretary of Agriculture, and the head of any other agency or instrumentality referred to in subparagraph (A) , shall restrict, to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Treasury, access to employer identification numbers obtained pursuant to this subsection only to officers and employees of the United States whose duties or responsibilities require access for the purposes described in subparagraph (A) . The Secretary of Agriculture, and the head of any agency or instrumentality with which information is shared pursuant to subparagraph (A) , shall provide such other safeguards as the Secretary of the Treasury determines to be necessary or appropriate to protect the confidentiality of the employer identification numbers.
(3) Confidentiality and nondisclosure rules.
Employer identification numbers that are obtained or maintained pursuant to this subsection by the Secretary of Agriculture or the head of the instrumentality with which the information is shared pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be confidential, and no officer or employee of the United States who has or had access to the social security account numbers shall disclose any such employer identification number obtained thereby in any manner. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “officer or employee” includes a former officer or employee.
(4) Sanctions.
Paragraphs (1) , (2) , and (3) of section 7213(a) shall apply with respect to the unauthorized willful disclosure to any person of employer identification numbers maintained pursuant to this subsection by the Secretary of Agriculture or any agency or instrumentality with which information is shared pursuant to paragraph (2) in the same manner and to the same extent as such paragraphs apply with respect to unauthorized disclosures of return and return information described in such paragraphs. Paragraph (4) of section 7213(a) shall apply with respect to the willful offer of any item of material value in exchange for any such employer identification number in the same manner and to the same extent as such paragraph applies with respect to offers (in exchange for any return or return information) described in such paragraph.
(g) Access to employer identification numbers by Federal Crop Insurance Corporation for purposes of the Federal Crop Insurance Act.
(1) In general.
In the administration of section 506 of the Federal Crop Insurance Act, the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation may require each policyholder and each reinsured company to furnish to the insurer or to the Corporation the employer identification number of such policyholder, subject to the requirements of this paragraph. No officer or employee of the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, or authorized person shall have access to any such number for any purpose other than the establishment of a system of records necessary to the effective administration of such Act. The Manager of the Corporation may require each policyholder to provide to the Manager or authorized person, at such times and in such manner as prescribed by the Manager, the employer identification number of each entity that holds or acquires a substantial beneficial interest in the policyholder. For purposes of this subclause, the term “substantial beneficial interest” means not less than 5 percent of all beneficial interest in the policyholder. The Secretary of Agriculture shall restrict, to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Treasury, access to employer identification numbers obtained pursuant to this paragraph only to officers and employees of the United States or authorized persons whose duties or responsibilities require access for the administration of the Federal Crop Insurance Act.
(2) Confidentiality and nondisclosure rules.
Employer identification numbers maintained by the Secretary of Agriculture or the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation pursuant to this subsection shall be confidential, and except as authorized by this subsection , no officer or employee of the United States or authorized person who has or had access to such employer identification numbers shall disclose any such employer identification number obtained thereby in any manner. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “officer or employee” includes a former officer or employee. For purposes of this subsection , the term “authorized person” means an officer or employee of an insurer whom the Manager of the Corporation designates by rule, subject to appropriate safeguards including a prohibition against the release of such social security account numbers (other than to the Corporations) by such person.
(3) Sanctions.
Paragraphs (1) , (2) , and (3) of section 7213(a) shall apply with respect to the unauthorized willful disclosure to any person of employer identification numbers maintained by the Secretary of Agriculture or the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation pursuant to this subsection in the same manner and to the same extent as such paragraphs apply with respect to unauthorized disclosures of return and return information described in such paragraphs. Paragraph (4) of section 7213(a) shall apply with respect to the willful offer of any item of material value in exchange for any such employer identification number in the same manner and to the same extent as such paragraph applies with respect to offers (in exchange for any return or return information) described in such paragraph.
(h) Identifying information required with respect to certain seller-provided financing.
(1) Payor.
If any taxpayer claims a deduction under section 163 for qualified residence interest on any seller-provided financing, such taxpayer shall include on the return claiming such deduction the name, address, and TIN of the person to whom such interest is paid or accrued.
(2) Recipient.
If any person receives or accrues interest referred to in paragraph (1) , such person shall include on the return for the taxable year in which such interest is so received or accrued the name, address, and TIN of the person liable for such interest.
(3) Furnishing of information between payor and recipient.
If any person is required to include the TIN of another person on a return under paragraph (1) or (2) , such other person shall furnish his TIN to such person.
(4) Seller-provided financing.
For purposes of this subsection , the term “seller-provided financing” means any indebtedness incurred in acquiring any residence if the person to whom such indebtedness is owed is the person from which such residence was acquired.

Reg §301.7701-15. Income tax return preparer.
Caution: The Treasury has not yet amended Reg § 301.7701-15 to reflect changes made by P.L. 110-28
(a) In general. A tax return preparer is any person who prepares for compensation, or who employs one or more persons to prepare for compensation, all or a substantial portion of any return of tax or any claim for refund of tax under the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
(b) Definitions.
(1) WG&L Treatises Signing tax return preparer. A signing tax return preparer is the individual tax return preparer who has the primary responsibility for the overall substantive accuracy of the preparation of such return or claim for refund.
(2) WG&L Treatises Nonsigning tax return preparer—
(i) In general. A nonsigning tax return preparer is any tax return preparer who is not a signing tax return preparer but who prepares all or a substantial portion of a return or claim for refund within the meaning of paragraph (b)(3) of this section with respect to events that have occurred at the time the advice is rendered. In determining whether an individual is a nonsigning tax return preparer, time spent on advice that is given after events have occurred that represents less than 5 percent of the aggregate time incurred by such individual with respect to the position(s) giving rise to the understatement shall not be taken into account. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, time spent on advice before the events have occurred will be taken into account if all facts and circumstances show that the position(s) giving rise to the understatement is primarily attributable to the advice, the advice was substantially given before events occurred primarily to avoid treating the person giving the advice as a tax return preparer, and the advice given before events occurred was confirmed after events had occurred for purposes of preparing a tax return. Examples of nonsigning tax return preparers are tax return preparers who provide advice (written or oral) to a taxpayer (or to another tax return preparer) when that advice leads to a position or entry that constitutes a substantial portion of the return within the meaning of paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(ii) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph (b)(2) are illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. Attorney A, an attorney in a law firm, provides legal advice to a large corporate taxpayer regarding a completed corporate transaction. The advice provided by A is directly relevant to the determination of an entry on the taxpayer's return, and this advice leads to a position(s) or entry that constitutes a substantial portion of the return. A, however, does not prepare any other portion of the taxpayer's return and is not the signing tax return preparer of this return. A is considered a nonsigning tax return preparer.
Example 2. Attorney B, an attorney in a law firm, provides legal advice to a large corporate taxpayer regarding the tax consequences of a proposed corporate transaction. Based upon this advice, the corporate taxpayer enters into the transaction. Once the transaction is completed, the corporate taxpayer does not receive any additional advice from B with respect to the transaction. B did not provide advice with respect to events that have occurred and is not considered a tax return preparer.
Example 3. The facts are the same as Example 2, except that Attorney B provides supplemental advice to the corporate taxpayer on a phone call after the transaction is completed. Attorney B did not provide advice before the corporate transaction occurred with the primary intent to avoid being treated as a tax return preparer. The time incurred on this supplemental advice by B represented less than 5 percent of the aggregate amount of time spent by B providing tax advice on the position. B is not considered a tax return preparer.
(3) Substantial portion.
(i) Only a person who prepares all or a substantial portion of a return or claim for refund shall be considered to be a tax return preparer of the return or claim for refund. A person who renders tax advice on a position that is directly relevant to the determination of the existence, characterization, or amount of an entry on a return or claim for refund will be regarded as having prepared that entry. Whether a schedule, entry, or other portion of a return or claim for refund is a substantial portion is determined based upon whether the person knows or reasonably should know that the tax attributable to the schedule, entry, or other portion of a return or claim for refund is a substantial portion of the tax required to be shown on the return or claim for refund. A single tax entry may constitute a substantial portion of the tax required to be shown on a return. Factors to consider in determining whether a schedule, entry, or other portion of a return or claim for refund is a substantial portion include but are not limited to—
(A) the size and complexity of the item relative to the taxpayer's gross income; and
(B) the size of the understatement attributable to the item compared to the taxpayer's reported tax liability.
(ii)
(A) For purposes of applying the rules of paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section to a nonsigning tax return preparer within the meaning of paragraph (b)(2) of this section only, the schedule or other portion is not considered to be a substantial portion if the schedule, entry, or other portion of the return or claim for refund involves amounts of gross income, amounts of deductions, or amounts on the basis of which credits are determined that are—
(1) Less than $10,000; or
(2) Less than $400,000 and also less than 20 percent of the gross income as shown on the return or claim for refund (or, for an individual, the individual's adjusted gross income).
(B) If more than one schedule, entry or other portion is involved, all schedules, entries or other portions shall be aggregated in applying the de minimis rule in paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(A) of this section.
(C) The de minimis rule in paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(A) of this section shall not apply to a signing tax return preparer within the meaning of paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(iii) A tax return preparer with respect to one return is not considered to be a tax return preparer of another return merely because an entry or entries reported on the first return may affect an entry reported on the other return, unless the entry or entries reported on the first return are directly reflected on the other return and constitute a substantial portion of the other return. For example, the sole preparer of a partnership return of income or small business corporation income tax return is considered a tax return preparer of a partner's or a shareholder's return if the entry or entries on the partnership or small business corporation return reportable on the partner's or shareholder's return constitute a substantial portion of the partner's or shareholder's return.
(iv) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph (b)(3) are illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. Accountant C prepares a Form 8886, ``Reportable Transaction Disclosure Statement'', that is used to disclose reportable transactions. C does not prepare the tax return or advise the taxpayer regarding the tax return reporting position of the transaction to which the Form 8886 relates. The preparation of the Form 8886 is not directly relevant to the determination of the existence, characterization, or amount of an entry on a tax return or claim for refund. Rather, the Form 8886 is prepared by C to disclose a reportable transaction. C has not prepared a substantial portion of the tax return and is not considered a tax return preparer under section 6694.
Example 2. Accountant D prepares a schedule for an individual taxpayer's Form 1040, ``U.S. Individual Income Tax Return'', reporting $4,000 in dividend income and gives oral or written advice about Schedule A, which results in a claim of a medical expense deduction totaling $5,000, but does not sign the tax return. D is not a nonsigning tax return preparer because the total aggregate amount of the deductions is less than $10,000.
(4) Return and claim for refund—
(i) Return. For purposes of this section, a return of tax is a return (including an amended or adjusted return) filed by or on behalf of a taxpayer reporting the liability of the taxpayer for tax under the Code, if the type of return is identified in published guidance in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. A return of tax also includes any information return or other document identified in published guidance in the Internal Revenue Bulletin and that reports information that is or may be reported on another taxpayer's return under the Code if the information reported on the information return or other document constitutes a substantial portion of the taxpayer's return within the meaning of paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(ii) Claim for refund. For purposes of this section, a claim for refund of tax includes a claim for credit against any tax that is included in published guidance in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. A claim for refund also includes a claim for payment under section 6420, 6421, or 6427.
(c) Mechanical or clerical assistance. A person who furnishes to a taxpayer or other tax return preparer sufficient information and advice so that completion of the return or claim for refund is largely a mechanical or clerical matter is considered a tax return preparer, even though that person does not actually place or review placement of information on the return or claim for refund. See also paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(d) Qualifications. A person may be a tax return preparer without regard to educational qualifications and professional status requirements.
(e) Outside the United States. A person who prepares a return or claim for refund outside the United States is a tax return preparer, regardless of the person's nationality, residence, or the location of the person's place of business, if the person otherwise satisfies the definition of tax return preparer. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 301.6109-1(g), the person shall secure an employer identification number if the person is an employer of another tax return preparer, is a partnership in which one or more of the general partners is a tax return preparer, is a firm in which one or more of the equity holders is a tax return preparer, or is an individual not employed by another tax return preparer.
(f) Persons who are not tax return preparers.
(1) The following persons are not tax return preparers:
(i) An official or employee of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) performing official duties.
(ii) Any individual who provides tax assistance under a Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program established by the IRS, but only with respect to those returns prepared as part of the VITA program.
(iii) Any organization sponsoring or administering a VITA program established by the IRS, but only with respect to that sponsorship or administration.
(iv) Any individual who provides tax counseling for the elderly under a program established pursuant to section 163 of the Revenue Act of 1978, but only with respect to those returns prepared as part of that program.
(v) Any organization sponsoring or administering a program to provide tax counseling for the elderly established pursuant to section 163 of the Revenue Act of 1978, but only with respect to that sponsorship or administration.
(vi) Any individual who provides tax assistance as part of a qualified Low-Income Taxpayer Clinic (LITC), as defined by section 7526, subject to the requirements of paragraphs (f)(2) and (3) of this section, but only with respect to those returns and claims for refund prepared as part of the LITC program.
(vii) Any organization that is a qualified LITC, as defined by section 7526, subject to the requirements of paragraphs (f)(2) and (3) of this section.
(viii) An individual providing only typing, reproduction, or other mechanical assistance in the preparation of a return or claim for refund.
(ix) An individual preparing a return or claim for refund of a taxpayer, or an officer, a general partner, member, shareholder, or employee of a taxpayer, by whom the individual is regularly and continuously employed or compensated or in which the individual is a general partner.
(x) An individual preparing a return or claim for refund for a trust, estate, or other entity of which the individual either is a fiduciary or is an officer, general partner, or employee of the fiduciary.
(xi) An individual preparing a claim for refund for a taxpayer in response to—
(A) A notice of deficiency issued to the taxpayer; or
(B) A waiver of restriction on assessment after initiation of an audit of the taxpayer or another taxpayer if a determination in the audit of the other taxpayer affects, directly or indirectly, the liability of the taxpayer for tax.
(xii) A person who prepares a return or claim for refund for a taxpayer with no explicit or implicit agreement for compensation, even if the person receives an insubstantial gift, return service, or favor.
(2) Paragraphs (f)(1)(vi) and (vii) of this section apply only if any assistance with a return of tax or claim for refund is directly related to a controversy with the IRS for which the qualified LITC is providing assistance or is an ancillary part of an LITC program to inform individuals for whom English is a second language about their rights and responsibilities under the Code.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (f)(2) of this section, paragraphs (f)(1)(vi) and (f)(1)(vii) of this section do not apply if an LITC charges a separate fee or varies a fee based on whether the LITC provides assistance with a return of tax or claim for refund under the Code or if the LITC charges more than a nominal fee for its services.
(4) For purposes of paragraph (f)(1)(ix) of this section, the employee of a corporation owning more than 50 percent of the voting power of another corporation, or the employee of a corporation more than 50 percent of the voting power of which is owned by another corporation, is considered the employee of the other corporation as well.
(5) For purposes of paragraph (f)(1)(x) of this section, an estate, guardianship, conservatorship, committee, or any similar arrangement for a taxpayer under a legal disability (such as a minor, an incompetent, or an infirm individual) is considered a trust or estate.
(6) Examples. The mechanical assistance exception described in paragraph (f)(1)(viii) of this section is illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. A reporting agent received employment tax information from a client from the client's business records. The reporting agent did not render any tax advice to the client or exercise any discretion or independent judgment on the client's underlying tax positions. The reporting agent processed the client's information, signed the return as authorized by the client pursuant to Form 8655, Reporting Agent Authorization, and filed the client's return using the information supplied by the client. The reporting agent is not a tax return preparer.
Example 2. A reporting agent rendered tax advice to a client on determining whether its workers are employees or independent contractors for Federal tax purposes. For compensation, the reporting agent received employment tax information from the client, processed the client's information and filed the client's return using the information supplied by the client. The reporting agent is a tax return preparer.
(g) Effective/applicability date. This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
________________________________________
T.D. 7519, 11/17/77 , amend T.D. 7675, 2/20/80 , T.D. 9026, 12/17/2002 , T.D. 9436, 12/15/2008 .
________________________________________